Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T18:58:50.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reflection High-Energy Electron Diffraction as an Intrinsic Material Property Sensor for Machine Condition Transfer Function in Molecular Beam Epitaxial Growth of III-V Compound Semiconductors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

P. Chen
Affiliation:
Center for Intelligent Manufacturing of Semiconductors (CIMOS) Materials Science & Engineering Department
C. Wangt
Affiliation:
Center for Intelligent Manufacturing of Semiconductors (CIMOS) Mathematics Department
A. Madhukar
Affiliation:
Center for Intelligent Manufacturing of Semiconductors (CIMOS) Materials Science & Engineering Department Mathematics Department
T. Khant
Affiliation:
Center for Intelligent Manufacturing of Semiconductors (CIMOS) Mathematics Department
A. Small
Affiliation:
Center for Intelligent Manufacturing of Semiconductors (CIMOS) Physics Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, pingchen@rcf.usc.edu
Z. Yan
Affiliation:
Center for Intelligent Manufacturing of Semiconductors (CIMOS) Physics Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, pingchen@rcf.usc.edu
R. Viswanathan
Affiliation:
Center for Intelligent Manufacturing of Semiconductors (CIMOS) Materials Science & Engineering Department
Get access

Abstract

A new approach is introduced for identifying a relation between the growth parameters measured in two molecular beam epitaxy systems, thereby realizing transfer of optimized growth conditions transfer. Test results show that the proposed approach is promising.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Madhukar, A., in Physics of Quantum Electronic Devices, Springer Series in Electronics and Photonics, vol.28, edited by. F., Capasso, (New York, Springer-Verlag, 1989), p. 13.Google Scholar
2. Cho, A. Y., J. Appl. Phys. 42, 2074 (1971).Google Scholar
3. Harris, J. J., Joyce, B. A., and Dobson, P. J., Surf. Sci. 103, L90 (1981)Google Scholar
4. Chen, P., Madhukar, A., Kim, J. Y. and Lee, T. C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 48, 650 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Neave, J. H., Joyce, B. A., and Dobson, P., Appl. Phys. A, 34, 179 (1984).Google Scholar
6. Chen, P. et al, SPIE Proc. 796 139 (1987), J. Zhang et al, , Appl. Phys. A 42, 317 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Voillot, F. et al, Superlattices and Microstructures 3, 313 (1987)Google Scholar
8. Wang, C. et al, submitted to IEEE Trans. on Semicon. Manufacturing for publication.Google Scholar
9. Schumaker, L. L., Spline Functions: Basic Theory, (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1981).Google Scholar
10. Hestenes, M. R., Optimization Theory: The Finite Dimensional Case, (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1975).Google Scholar
11. Levenberg, K., Quart. Appl. Matt. 2, 164 (1944),.D. Marquardt, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 11, 431 (1963), J. E. Dennis, R. B. Schnabel, Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonlinear Equation (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1983).Google Scholar
12. Box, G. E. P. et al, Statistics for Experimenter, (John Wiley & Sons Inc. New York, 1978)Google Scholar