Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T22:37:45.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantum Computing: From Bragg Reflections to Decoherence Estimates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Peter Pfeifer  and
Chen Hou
Peter Pfeifer
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, U.S.A.
Chen Hou
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

We give an exposition of the principles of quantum computing (logic gates, exponential parallelism from polynomial hardware, fast quantum algorithms, quantum error correction, hardware requirements, and experimental milestones). A compact description of the quantum Fourier transform to find the period of a function—the key step in Shor's factoring algorithm—illustrates how parallel state evolution along many classical computational paths produces fast algorithms by constructive interference similar to Bragg reflections in x-ray crystallography. On the hardware side, we present a new method to estimate critical time scales for the operation of a quantum computer. We derive a universal upper bound on the probability of a computation to fail due to decoherence (entanglement of the computer with the environment), as a function of time. The bound is parameter-free, requiring only the interaction between the computer and the environment, and the time-evolving state in the absence of any interaction. For a simple model we find that the bound performs well and decoherence is small when the energy of the computer state is large compared to the interaction energy. This supports a recent estimate of minimum energy requirements for quantum computation.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 746: Symposia Q/R – Magnetoelectronics-Novel Magnetic Phenomena in Nanostructures – Advanced Characterization of Artificially Structured Magnetic Materials , 2002 , Q8.5
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Brezger, B. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 100404 (2002).Google Scholar
2. Pfeifer, P., in McGraw-Hill Yearbook of Science and Technology 2002 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001), pp. 294–298.Google Scholar
3. Berman, G.P., Doolen, G.D., Mainieri, R., and Tsifrinovich, V.I., Introduction to Quantum Computers (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998).Google Scholar
4. Gruska, J., Quantum Computing (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1999).Google Scholar
5. Pittenger, A.O., An Introduction to Quantum Computing Algorithms (Birkhäuser, Boston, 2000).Google Scholar
6. Nielsen, M.A. and Chuang, I.L., Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).Google Scholar
7. Macchiavello, C., Palma, G.M., and Zeilinger, A. (eds.), Quantum Computation and Quantum Information Theory (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001).Google Scholar
8. Special issue “Experimental Proposals for Quantum Computation”, Fortschr. Phys. 48, 769–1138 (2000).Google Scholar
9. Special issue “Quantum Computation for Physical Modeling”, Comput. Phys. Comm. 146, 277–344 (2002).Google Scholar
10. Gottesman, D. and Lo, H.-K., Phys. Today 53 (11), 22 (2000).Google Scholar
11. Shor, P., in Proceedings of the 35th Annual Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, edited by Goldwasser, S. (IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 1994), pp. 124–134.Google Scholar
12. Ekert, A. and Jozsa, R., Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 733 (1996).Google Scholar
13. Hallgren, S., in Proceedings of the 34th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, edited by Reif, J. (ACM Press, New York, 2002), pp. 653–658.Google Scholar
14. Knill, E., Laflamme, R., Martinez, R., and Tseng, C.-H., Nature 404, 368 (2000).Google Scholar
15. Vandersypen, L.M.K. et al., Nature 414, 883 (2001).Google Scholar
16. Sackett, C.A. et al., Nature 404, 256 (2000).Google Scholar
17. Rauschenbeutel, A. et al., Science 288, 2024 (2000).Google Scholar
18. Leggett, A.J., Science 296, 861 (2002);Google Scholar
Vion, D. et al., Science 296, 861 (2002), 886;Google Scholar
Yu, Y. et al., Science 296, 861 (2002), 889.Google Scholar
19. Pfeifer, P. and Fröhlich, J., Rev. Mod. Phys. 67, 759 (1995).Google Scholar
20. Pfeifer, P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3365 (1993); 71, 306 (1993).Google Scholar
21. Gea-Banacloche, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 217901 (2002).Google Scholar