Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T10:58:58.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantitative Measurements of Segregation In Co-Cr-X Magnetic Recording Media by Energy-Filtered Transmission Electron Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

J. Bentley
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, PO Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6376, bentleyj@ornl.gov
J.E. Wittig
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235
T.P. Nolan
Affiliation:
Komag Inc., 1704 Automation Parkway, San Jose, CA 95131
Get access

Abstract

Reliable core-loss spectroscopic methods have been developed for mapping elemental segregation in Co-Cr-X magnetic recording media by energy-filtered transmission electron microscopy. Extraction of quantitative compositions at a spatial resolution approaching 1 nm involves sophisticated treatments for diffraction contrast, variations in specimen thickness, and closely-spaced oxygen K and chromium L23 ionization edges. These methods reveal that intergranular chromium levels are ∼25 at.% for random-angle boundaries and ∼15 at.% for 90° boundaries in films of Co84Cr12Ta4 d.c. magnetron sputtered at 250°C.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Gubbens, A.J. and Krivanek, O.L., Ultramicroscopy 51 (1993) 146.10.1016/0304-3991(93)90143-LGoogle Scholar
2. Kimoto, K., Yahisa, Y., Hirano, T., Usami, K., and Narishige, S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 34, L352 (1995).Google Scholar
3. Wittig, L.E., Nolan, T.P., Ross, C.A., Schabes, M.E., Tang, K., Sinclair, R. and Bentley, J., IEEE Trans. Magn., in press.Google Scholar
4. Bentley, J., Kenik, E.A., Siangchaew, K. and Libera, M., in Proc. Microscopy & Microanalysis '96, edited by Bailey, G.W. et al. (San Francisco Press, San Francisco, 1996) p. 542.Google Scholar
5. Krivanek, O.L., Gubbens, A.J. and Dellby, N., Microsc. Microanal. Microstruct. 2, 315 (1991);Google Scholar
Krivanek, O.L., Gubbens, A.J., Dellby, N. and Meyer, C.E., Microsc. Microanal. Microstruct. 3, 187 (1992).10.1051/mmm:0199200302-3018700Google Scholar
6. Evans, N.D. and Kundmann, M.K., in Proc. Microscopy & Microanalysis '96, edited by Bailey, G.W. et al. (San Francisco Press, San Francisco, 1996) p. 546.Google Scholar
7. Anderson, I.M., Bentley, J. and Busby, J.R., submitted to J. Microscopy Google Scholar
8. Bentley, J., Kenik, E.A., Evans, N.D., Hall, E.L. and Zinkle, S.J., in Proc. EMAG95, Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. No. 147, edited by Cherns, D. (IOP Publ., Bristol, 1995) p. 187.Google Scholar
9. Wittig, J.E., Nolan, T.P., Sinclair, R. and Bentley, J., these proceedings.Google Scholar