Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T12:01:00.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Production of Crucible Steel by Co-Fusion: Archaeometallurgical Evidence from the Ninth-Early Tenth Century at the Site of Merv, Turkmenistan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Ann Feuerbach ,
John F. Merkel  and
Dafydd R. Griffiths
Ann Feuerbach
Affiliation:
University College London, Institute of Archaeology, London, United Kingdom.
John F. Merkel
Affiliation:
University College London, Institute of Archaeology, London, United Kingdom.
Dafydd R. Griffiths
Affiliation:
University College London, Institute of Archaeology, London, United Kingdom.
Get access

Abstract

Various methods were used to produce steel in early Islamic times. According to early Islamic texts, three methods are described for indirect production of steel (fuladh). The methods are solid-state carburization of wrought iron, partial decarburization of cast iron or a high carbon steel, and co-fusion of cast iron with wrought iron. Evidence from a metallurgical workshop at Merv, dated to the ninth-early tenth century A.D., provides an illustration of the co-fusion method of steel production in crucibles. The primary investigations of the crucibles are presented. The crucible slag was found to contain droplets of cast iron and steel and the crucible fabric contains mullite.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 462: Symposium DD – Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology V , 1996 , 105
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ai-Hassan, A. Y. 1978. Iron and Steel Technology in Medieval Arabic Sources. Journal for the History of Arabic Science. 2: 1. 31–52.Google Scholar
2. Al-Hassan, A. Y. and Hill, D.R. 1986. Tslamie Technology: An illustrated Guide. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, pp. 252–257.Google Scholar
3. Allan, J. W. 1979. Persian Metal Technology. Ithica Press. London, pp. 65–76.Google Scholar
4. Lowe, T. 1989. Refractories in High-Carbon Iron Processing: A Preliminary Study of the Deccani Wootz-Making Crucibles. In McGovern, P.E. (ed). Ceramics and Civilization. The American Ceramics Society. Vol. IV. pp. 237–251.Google Scholar
5. Barraclough, K. 1984. Crucible Steel. The Metals Society: London, pp. 106.Google Scholar
6. Percy, J. 1864. Metallurgy. John Murray. London, pp. 802–803.Google Scholar
7. Bronson, B. 1986. The Making and Selling of Wootz, A Crucible Steel of india. Archaeomaterials 1. pp. 13–51.Google Scholar