Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T07:10:28.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plastic Strain Estimation from Neutron Bragg Peaks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

G.M. Swallowe
Affiliation:
Loughborough University of Technology, Department of Physics, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, United Kingdom
J.C. Osborn
Affiliation:
Loughborough University of Technology, Department of Physics, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, United Kingdom
P. Lukas
Affiliation:
Nuclear Physics Institute, 25068 Rez, Czech Republic
P. Mikula
Affiliation:
Nuclear Physics Institute, 25068 Rez, Czech Republic
M. Vrana
Affiliation:
Nuclear Physics Institute, 25068 Rez, Czech Republic
Get access

Abstract

This paper describes experiments carried out at three neutron sources in which Bragg reflection peak profiles of samples of copper, nickel and iron were investigated as a function of plastic strain. All peaks were well fitted by Gaussian functions for true strains of upto 0.25. Peak widths of all samples were found to be simple power law functions of strain and independent of measurement direction. This suggests that use could be made of data gathered in standard residual elastic stress measurements to simultaneously estimate plastic strains.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Abolfathi, E., Webster, P. J., Swallowe, G. M., Modlen, G. F., Ascough, J., Low, K. S., Mat. Sci. and Tech., 6, 575, (1990)Google Scholar
2 Guinier, A., X-ray Diffraction in crystals, imperfect crystals and amorphous bodies (Dover 1994 reprint of the 1963 English translation) p. 142 Google Scholar
3 Noyan, I. C., Cohen, J. B., Residual Stress, (Springer-Verlag 1989 ) p. 205 Google Scholar
4 Stokes, A. R. Proc. Phys. Soc. Lond. 61, 382, (1948)Google Scholar
5 Nandi, R. K., Kuo, H. K., Schlosberg, W., Wissler, G., Cohen, J. B., and Christ, B., J. Appl. Cryst. 17, 22, (1984)Google Scholar
6 Mikula, P., Lukas, P., Vrana, M., Klimanek, P., Kschidock, T., Macek, K., Janovec, J., Osborn, J. C. and Swallowe, G. M., J. de Physique IV, 3, 2183, (1993)Google Scholar