Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:52:04.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PECVD Synthesis of Silicon Nanowires Assisted by Templates of Gallium Islands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Annika Gewalt
Affiliation:
annika.gewalt@ovgu.de, Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Institute of Micro and Sensor Systems, Magdeburg, Germany
Bodo Kalkofen
Affiliation:
bodo.kalkofen@ovgu.de, Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Institute of Micro and Sensor Systems, Magdeburg, Germany
Marco Lisker
Affiliation:
lisker@ihp-microelectronics.com, IHP GmbH, Innovations for High Performance Microelectronics, Frankfurt (Oder), Germany
Edmund P. Burte
Affiliation:
edmund.burte@ovgu.de, Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Institute of Micro and Sensor Systems, Magdeburg, Germany
Get access

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the growth of silicon nanowires forced by small gallium droplet templates. Those gallium islands previously were deposited by a modified PECVD method. Two different delivery techniques of the trimethylgallium precursor (TMGa) were tested regarding their applicability. On the one hand standard liquid delivery was performed, on the other the precursor was transported by vapor draw out of the heated bubbler. The TMGa then was pulsed into the carrier gas flow. The effects on the deposited islands of both delivery methods were compared. As substrates <111> oriented p-doped silicon wafers were used. For the subsequent growth of the silicon wires similarly PECVD was used as growth method. Silane served as precursor. Argon and hydrogen were used as plasma enhanced gases. The effects of the Ga particles deposited by both process modes upon the generated wires were analyzed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Tsakalakos, L. Balch, J. et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 233117233119 (2007).10.1063/1.2821113Google Scholar
2 Li, D. Wu, Y. Kim, P. Shi, L. Yang, P. and Majumdar, A. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, (14), 29342936 (2003)10.1063/1.1616981Google Scholar
3 Graetz, J. Ahn, C. C. et al., Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 6 (9) A194–A197 (2003)10.1149/1.1596917Google Scholar
4 Chan, C.K. Peng, H. Liu, G. McIlwrath, K. Zhang, X. F. Huggins, R. and Cui, Y. Nature Nanotechnology Letters 3, 3135 (2008).10.1038/nnano.2007.411Google Scholar
5 Lu, J. and Chamberlin, D.: “Creating catalytically active nanoparticles via block copolymer templates for carbon nanotube and silicon nanowire growth.” 0921-T01-04, MRS Spring 2006 Proceedings, Symposium TGoogle Scholar
6 Olesinski, R. W. Kanani, N. and Abbashian, G. J. Bulletin of Alloy Phase Diagrams 6 (4), 362, (1985).10.1007/BF02880523Google Scholar
7 Iacopi, F. Vereecken, P. M. Shaekers, M. Caymax, M. Moelans, N. Blanpain, B. Richard, O. Detavernier, C. Griffiths, H. Nanotechnology 18 505307 (7pp), (2007).10.1088/0957-4484/18/50/505307Google Scholar
8 Wagner, R. S. and Ellis, W. C. Appl. Phys. Lett. 4 (5), 8990, (1964).10.1063/1.1753975Google Scholar
9 Lin, R. and Masel, R. I. Surface Science 258: 225234, (1991).10.1016/0039-6028(91)90916-GGoogle Scholar
10 Shogen, S. Matsumi, Y. Kawasaki, M. Toyoshima, I. Okabe, H. Journal of Applied Physics 70(1): 452468, (1991).10.1063/1.350249Google Scholar
11 Hofmann, S. Ducati, C. et al., Journal of Applied Physics 94(9): 60056011 (2003).10.1063/1.1614432Google Scholar