Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T21:04:15.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimizing Stressor Film Deposition Sequence in Polish Rate Order for Best Planarization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2011

John H Zhang ,
Changyong Xiao ,
Jay W Strane ,
Rajasekhar Venigalla ,
Laertis Economikos ,
Lindsey Hall ,
Jie Chen ,
Derek C Stoll ,
Jin Wallner  and
Haoren Zhuang
...Show all authors
John H Zhang
Affiliation:
STMicroelectronics, 2070 Route 52, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533, U.S.A.
Changyong Xiao
Affiliation:
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, 2070 Route 52, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533, U.S.A.
Jay W Strane
Affiliation:
IBM Semiconductor Research and Development Center (SRDC), 2070 Route 52, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533, U.S.A.
Rajasekhar Venigalla
Affiliation:
IBM Semiconductor Research and Development Center (SRDC), 2070 Route 52, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533, U.S.A.
Laertis Economikos
Affiliation:
IBM Semiconductor Research and Development Center (SRDC), 2070 Route 52, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533, U.S.A.
Lindsey Hall
Affiliation:
STMicroelectronics, 2070 Route 52, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533, U.S.A.
Jie Chen
Affiliation:
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, 2070 Route 52, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533, U.S.A.
Derek C Stoll
Affiliation:
IBM Semiconductor Research and Development Center (SRDC), 2070 Route 52, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533, U.S.A.
Jin Wallner
Affiliation:
IBM Semiconductor Research and Development Center (SRDC), 2070 Route 52, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533, U.S.A.
Haoren Zhuang
Affiliation:
Infineon Technologies, 2070 Route 52, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533, U.S.A
Paul Ferreira
Affiliation:
STMicroelectronics, 2070 Route 52, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533, U.S.A.
Walter Kleemeier
Affiliation:
STMicroelectronics, 2070 Route 52, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533, U.S.A.
Cindy Goldberg
Affiliation:
STMicroelectronics, 2070 Route 52, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533, U.S.A.
Yongsik Moon
Affiliation:
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, 2070 Route 52, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533, U.S.A.
Connie Truong
Affiliation:
IBM Semiconductor Research and Development Center (SRDC), 2070 Route 52, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533, U.S.A.
John Sudijono
Affiliation:
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, 2070 Route 52, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533, U.S.A.
Xiaomeng Chen
Affiliation:
IBM Semiconductor Research and Development Center (SRDC), 2070 Route 52, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533, U.S.A.
Ron Sampson
Affiliation:
STMicroelectronics, 2070 Route 52, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Chemical Mechanical Polish (CMP) is one of the key technologies for the development of modern high performance integrated circuits. The requirements for the CMP uniformity get extremely demanding in order to meet the litho requirements for 32nm technology node and beyond. In this paper, two kinds of orders related to the stressor films that affect the CMP uniformity are revealed. The first is the stressor films deposition order according to the CMP polish rate of each stressor film. The second is the stress gradients order that formed inside the films sitting on top of the stressors. Through the optimization of the order, we show successfully removal of couple hundreds angstroms stressor step heights within 300mm wafer range. The method developed here can also find applications in microelectromechanical systems and 3D integration circuits.

Keywords

CMPsemiconductingmicroelectronics
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1335: Symposium O – Materials, Processes, and Reliability for Advanced Interconnects for Micro- and Nanoelectronics , 2011 , mrss11-1335-o03-01
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Li, C., Zhang, X., Cao, Z., Science, 309, 909 (2005)Google Scholar
2. Hasegawa, Y., and Avouris, Ph., Science, 258, 1763 (1992)Google Scholar
3. Berger, R., Delamarche, E., Lang, H. P., Gerber, C., Gimzewski, J. K., Meyer, E., Guntherodt, H.J. Science, 276, 2021 (1997)Google Scholar
4. Hannon, J. B., Tersoff, J., Tromp, R. M., Science, 299, 295 (2002)Google Scholar
5. Connally, J. A., and Brown, S. B., Science, 256, 1537 (1992)Google Scholar
6. Green, D. J., Tandon, R., Sglavo, V. M., Science, 283, 1295 (1999)Google Scholar
7. King, A., Johnson, G., Engelberg, D., Ludwig, W., Marrow, J., Science, 321, 382 (2008)Google Scholar
8. Brown, H. R., Science, 263, 1411 (1994)Google Scholar
9. Stajdohar, R. E., Hettwer, P. F., Mccann, D. R., Science, 162, 902 (1968)Google Scholar
10. Murray, C. E.,.Besser, P. R., Witt, C., Jordan-Sweet, J. L., to be publishedGoogle Scholar
11. Capasso, F., Science, 235, 172 (1987)Google Scholar
12. Khang, D.Y., Jiang, H., Huang, Y., Rogers, J. A., Science, 311, 208 (2006)Google Scholar
13. Lee, H.N., Paeng, K., Swallen, S. F., Ediger, M. D., Science, 323, 231 (2009)Google Scholar
14. Yang, H.S., et al. , IEDM, 1075 (2004)Google Scholar
15. Zhang, J.H, Venigalla, R.,.Stoll, D. C., Wallner, J., Thompson, J. F., Sun, J., Zhuang, H., Xiao, C., Koo, J.E., Park, J.E., Kleemier, W., Barla, K., Truong, C., Chen, X., and Sampson, Ron, Proc. VMIC, 25, 95 (2008)Google Scholar