Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T03:54:59.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nonlinear Optical Properties of Tetrabenzporphyrins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Gary L. Wood
Affiliation:
Army Research Laboratory Fort Belvoir, VA 22060
Andrew G. Mott
Affiliation:
Army Research Laboratory Fort Belvoir, VA 22060
Mary J. Miller
Affiliation:
Army Research Laboratory Fort Belvoir, VA 22060
Masato Nakashima
Affiliation:
Natick Research Development and Engineering Center Natick, MA 01760
Joseph F. Roach
Affiliation:
Natick Research Development and Engineering Center Natick, MA 01760
Get access

Abstract

Optical limiting in a solution of tetrabenzporphyrin (TBP) dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (THF) was measured in an f/5 optical focusing arrangement using 532 nm wavelength laser light with a 9 ns pulse duration. The performance of this solution was compared to a variety of other materials. In order to better understand the nonlinear behavior of this material, apertured and unapertured Z-scans were performed. From these measurements it was determined that the excited-state cross section and its ratio to ground-state cross section were large. The nonlinear refraction of this material is made up of contributions from thermal density change and population redistribution. Limiter performance was modeled in an f/64 limiter. The limiter behavior of a slightly modified compound and an additional solvent were measured.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Miller, M.J., Mott, A.G., and Wood, G.L., Proc. of the 2nd DoD Workshop on Visible/NIR Optical Power Limiters, Wright Lab., Wright-Patterson, OH Feb. 15–17, 1994.Google Scholar
2 Sliney, D. and Wolbarsht, M., Safety with Lasers and Other Optical Sources, Plenum Press, New York, 1980.Google Scholar
3 Rao, D.V.G.L.N., Aranda, F.J., Roach, J.F., and Remy, D.E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 1241 (1991).Google Scholar
4 Guha, S., Kang, K., Porter, P., Roach, J.F., Remy, D.E., Aranda, F.J., and Rao, D.V.G.L.N., Opt. Lett. 17, 264 (1992).Google Scholar
5 Perry, J.W., Mansour, K., Marder, S.R., Perry, K.J., Alvarez, D. Jr., and Choong, I., Opt. Lett. 19, 625 (1994).Google Scholar
6 Si, J., Yang, M., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., Li, C., Wang, D., Dong, S., Sun, W., Opt. Commun. 109, 487 (1994).Google Scholar
7 Sheik-bahae, M., Said, A.A., and Van Stryland, E.W., Opt. Lett. 14, 955 (1990).Google Scholar
8 Mansour, K., Alvarez, D. Jr., Perry, K.J., Choong, I., Marder, S.R., and Perry, J.W., Proc. SPIE 1853, 1321 (1993).Google Scholar
9 Smith, D., IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE–5, 600 (1969).Google Scholar
10 Born, M. and Wolf, E., Principles of Optics, 5th ed., Pergamon, Oxford, 1975, p. 383.Google Scholar
11 Boyd, R.W., Nonlinear Optics, Academic Press, San Diego, 1992.Google Scholar
12 Wei, T.H., Hagan, D.J., Sence, M.J., Van Stryland, E.W., Perry, J.W., and Coulter, D.R., Appl. Phys. B 54, 46 (1992).Google Scholar