Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T09:47:20.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

NITRIDE BASED SCHOTTKY-BARRIER PHOTOVOLTAIC DEVICES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Balakrishnam R Jampana
Affiliation:
balu@udel.edu, University of Delaware, Materials Science and Engineering, 139 The Green, 201 Evans Hall,, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, United States, 302-831-0307
Omkar K Jani
Affiliation:
jani@ece.gatech.edu, Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 266 Ferst Dr NW, BH 195, Atlanta, GA, 30332, United States
Hongbo Yu
Affiliation:
hongbo@ece.gatech.edu, Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 266 Ferst Dr NW, BH 195, Atlanta, GA, 30332, United States
Ian T Ferguson
Affiliation:
ianf@ece.gatech.edu, Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 266 Ferst Dr NW, BH 195, Atlanta, GA, 30332, United States
Brian E McCandless
Affiliation:
bem@udel.edu, University of Delaware, Institute of Energy Conversion, 451 Wyoming Road, Newark, DE, 19716, United States
Steven S Hegedus
Affiliation:
ssh@udel.edu, University of Delaware, Institute of Energy Conversion, 451 Wyoming Road, Newark, DE, 19716, United States
Robert L Opila
Affiliation:
opila@udel.edu, University of Delaware, Materials Science and Engineering, 201 Dupont Hall, Newark, DE, 19716, United States
Christiana B Honsberg
Affiliation:
honsberg@udel.edu, University of Delaware, Electrical and Computer Engineering, 201 Evans Hall, Newark, DE, 19716, United States
Get access

Abstract

Schottky-barrier photovoltaic devices are fabricated by selective metal deposition on p-GaN. A 1.25 V open-circuit voltage is observed for the best device. Devices were optimized by annealing in forming gas at temperatures ranging from 550°C to 700°C. Annealing time and forming gas flow rate are used to control the metal-semiconductor Schottky barrier formation. Optimum fabrication parameters are achieved based on photovoltaic response from the devices under UV illumination. Barrier heights (0.47 eV - 0.49 eV) were used as basis to compare the device response. The Schottky-barrier height is very sensitive to processing conditions, for example a 2.5% increase in barrier height is observed when Schottky contact annealing temperature is changed from 600 °C to 650 °C. Under UV illumination, the open-circuit voltage and short-circuit current increase with increasing annealing temperature while the series resistance decreases under such conditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Jani, O., Ferguson, I. et al. (2007), Applied Physics Letters 91(13): 132117.10.1063/1.2793180Google Scholar
2. Liliental-Weber, Z., Benamara, M. et al. (2000), Boston, MA, USA, Mater. Res. Soc Google Scholar
3. Fonash, Stephen, (1981). “Solar cell device physics.”, Academic press Google Scholar
4. Landsberg, P. T. and Klimpke, C. (1977), Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, Math. Phys. Sci. (UK) 354(1676): 101– 18.Google Scholar
5. Mori, T., Kozawa, T. et al. (1996/12/02), Appl. Phys. Lett. (USA) 69(23): 35373539.Google Scholar
6. Kim, J. K., Lee, J.-L. et al. (2002), Journal of Applied Physics 92(11): 66716678.Google Scholar
7. Khan, M. A., Kuznia, J. N. et al. (1993), Applied Physics Letters 63(18): 24552456.10.1063/1.110473Google Scholar
8. Qin, Z. X., Chen, Z. Z. et al. (2004), Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing 78(5): 729731 Google Scholar
9. Schroder, D. K. (1990). Semiconductor material and device characterization, Wiley.Google Scholar
10. Liu, B., Lambers, E. et al. (2002), Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B (Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures) 20(4): 1394–401.Google Scholar
11. Shah, J. M., Li, Y. et al. (2004), Boston, MA, USA, Mater. Res. Soc.Google Scholar
12. Vertiatchikh, A., Kaminsky, E. et al. (2006/07/), Solid-State Electron. (UK) 50(7-8): 1425–9.Google Scholar