Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T17:05:44.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nanoscale Structure and High Velocity Sliding at Cu/Ag Interfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

James E. Hammerberg
Affiliation:
Applied Physics Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
Timothy C. Germann
Affiliation:
Applied Physics Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
Brad Lee Holian
Affiliation:
Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
Ramon Ravelo
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Materials Research Institute, University of Texas-El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968-0515
Get access

Abstract

We present the results of large-scale NonEquilibrium Molecular Dynamics (NEMD) simulations for Cu/Ag interfaces sliding in the velocity regime 0≤v≤1Km/sec. System sizes of 2.8 × 106 atoms are considered using Embedded Atom Method (EAM) potentials. Single crystals with 010 interfaces sliding along the <100> direction are considered. We discuss the observed velocity weakening in the tangential force at high velocities, and its connection with the observed dislocation structure and nanostructure that are nucleated during dry sliding.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bowden, F.P. and Tabor, D., The Friction and Lubrication of Solids, Parts I and II, (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1964).Google Scholar
2. Daw, M.S., Foiles, S.M., Baskes, M.I., Materials Science Reports 9, 251310 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Hammerberg, J.E., Holian, B.L., Röder, J. R, Bishop, A.R., and Zhou, S.J., Physica D123, 330340 (1998).Google Scholar
4. Hammerberg, J.E. and Holian, B.L., “Simulation Methods for Interfacial Friction in Solids,” Surface Modification and Processing: Physical and Chemical Tribological Methodologies, ed. Totten, G.E. and Liang, H. (M. Dekker, New York, 2004) (in press).Google Scholar
5. Beazley, D.M., Lomdahl, P.S., Grønbech-Jensen, N., Giles, R. and Tamayo, P., Ann. Rev. of Comp. Phys. III, ed. Stauffer, D. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1996), pp.119175.Google Scholar
6. Sprague, J.A., Montalenti, F., Uberuaga, B.P., Kress, J.D., and Voter, A.F., Phys. Rev. B66, 205415 (2002).Google Scholar
7. Kelchner, C.L., Plimpton, S.J., and Hamilton, J.C., Phys. Rev. B58, 1108511088 (1998).Google Scholar
8. Hammerberg, J.E., Ravelo, R., Germann, T.C., Holian, B.L., and Kress, J.D., “Sliding Friction at Compressed Ta/Al Interfaces,” Shock Compression of Condensed Matter-2003, ed. Forbes, J. (AIP Press, Melville, N. Y., 2004) (in press).Google Scholar
9. Hammerberg, J.E., Germann, T.C., and Holian, B.L., “Modeling High Speed Friction at Ductile Metal Interfaces,” Proc. Int. Conf. on New Models and Hydrocodes for Shock Wave Processes in Condensed Matter, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2002 (to be published).Google Scholar