Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T13:48:05.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nano-Crystalline Powders and Suspensions Generated Using A Flow-Through Hydrothermal Process, Part I: Characterization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

John G. Darab
Affiliation:
Padfic Northwest Laboratory [1], Richland, WA 99352
M. F. Buehler
Affiliation:
Padfic Northwest Laboratory [1], Richland, WA 99352
J. C. Linehan
Affiliation:
Padfic Northwest Laboratory [1], Richland, WA 99352
D. W. Matson
Affiliation:
Padfic Northwest Laboratory [1], Richland, WA 99352
Get access

Abstract

A wide range of ultra-fine, nano-crystalline powders and suspensions have been produced using the Rapid Thermal Decomposition of precursors in Solution (RTDS) technology. These materials include single and multi-component iron-, zirconium-, titanium-, nickel-, and chromium-oxide/oxyhydroxide powders. RTDS, which was developed at Pacific Northwest Laboratory, is a flow-through hydrothermal process capable of producing nano-crystalline particulate material at rates of up to 100 grams of solid per hour. We present the results of characterization efforts on RTDS iron oxyhydroxide and zirconium oxide systems. As-collected RTDS suspensions were characterized using optical light scattering. Separated RTDS powders were evaluated using X-ray diffraction, electron microscopy, gas adsorption analysis, thermal gravimetric analysis, and chemical analysis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Pacific Northwest Laboratory is operated for the United States Department of Energy by the Battelle Memorial Institute under contract DE-AC06-76RLO 1830.Google Scholar
2 Gleiter, H., Nanostructured Mat. 1,1 (1992).Google Scholar
3 Yan, M. F., in Advances in Powder Technology, edited by Chin, G. Y. (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1982), pp. 99133.Google Scholar
4 Matson, D. W., Linehan, J. C., and Bean, R. M., Mater. Lett. 14,222 (1992).Google Scholar
5 Matson, D. W., Linehan, J. C., Darab, J. G., and Buehler, M. F., Energy & Fuels 8,10 (1994).Google Scholar
6 Matson, D. W., Linehan, J. C., and Geusic, M. E., Part. Sei. & Tech. 10,143 (1992).Google Scholar
7 Darab, J. G., Linehan, J. C., Ma, Y., and Matson, D. W., in Applications of Synchrotron Radiation to Materials Science, edited by Perry, D.L., Shinn, N., Stockbauer, R., D'Amico, K., and Terminello, L. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 307, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993), pp. 914.Google Scholar
8 Six line ferrihydrite is so named because its XRD pattern consists of six broad lines. Believed to be a weakly crystalline, hydrated substructure of hematite [8].Google Scholar
9 Schwertmann, U. and Cornell, R. M., Iron Oxides in the Laboratory: Preparation and Characterization (VCH Publishers, Inc., New York, 1991).Google Scholar
10 German, R. M., Powder Metallurgy Science (Metal Powder Industries Federation, Princeton, 1984), pp. 1821.Google Scholar