Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:25:01.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Monte Carlo Modelling of Electrophotographic Dark Discharge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

S. J. Elmer
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, University College Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, United Kingdom.
J. M. Marshall
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, University College Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, United Kingdom.
R. A. C. M. M. Van Swaaij
Affiliation:
Debye Institute, Department of Atomic and Interface Physics, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80000, NL-3508 TA Utrecht, the, Netherlands.
J. Bezemer
Affiliation:
Debye Institute, Department of Atomic and Interface Physics, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80000, NL-3508 TA Utrecht, the, Netherlands.
A. R. Hepburn
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, University College Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, United Kingdom.
Get access

Abstract

In an electrophotographic experiment, surface voltage is measured for a-Si1-xCx:H films of different thicknesses. It is observed that the thickness normalised dark decay rate (TNDDR) at longer times is smaller for thicker than for thinner specimens. This phenomenon has also been reported for other materials. In order to get a better understanding of the dark discharge process, the monte Carlo technique is used to model electrophotographic dark discharge in materials of which a-Si1-xCx:H is typical. The present study considers every carrier within the model after each increment of a short time step. This then allows bimolecular effects and the presence of space charge to be accounted for.

The study concentrates on two different discharge mechanisms and the effects they have on the TNDDR for varying specimen thicknesses. For the first of these, a negative charge is deposited on the surface of the sample and drifts through the bulk under the influence of the local internal field (Surface Injection model). In the second, electron/hole pairs are generated within the bulk with both carriers being mobile through the specimen (Bulk Generation model). The subsequent surface decay is due to the recombination of bulk generated holes and trapped surface electrons. Results from these models are compared with those found experimentally.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ing, S. W. Jr. and Neyhart, J. H., J. Appl. Phys., 43, 2670 (1972).Google Scholar
2. Schein, L. B., Physical Rev. B, 10, 3451 (1974).Google Scholar
3. Kasap, S. O., Journal of Electrostatics, 22, 69 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Kasap, S. O., J. Appl. Phys., 64, 450 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Kakinuma, H. and Watanabe, T. J. Appl. Phys., 62, 1837 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Nakayama, Y., Kita, H., Takahashi, T., Akita, S. and Kawamura, T. J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 97&98, 743 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Elmer, S. J., Marshall, J. M. and Hepburn, A. R., in The 7th International School on Condensed Matter Physics, edited by Kirov, N. and Marshall, J. M. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1993) 635.Google Scholar
8 Marshall, J. M., Phil Mag., 36, 959 (1977).Google Scholar
9. van Swaaij, R. A. C M. M., Elmer, S. J., Willems, W. P. M., Bezemer, J., Marshall, J. M. and Hepburn, A. R., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 164–166, 533 (1993).Google Scholar