Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:12:46.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Molecular Modeling of Free Volume Distributions of Amorphous Membrane Polymers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Dieter Hofmann ,
Matthias Heuchel ,
Yuri Yampolskii  and
A. V. Topchiev
Dieter Hofmann
Affiliation:
GKSS Research Center, Institute of Chemistry, Kantstr. 55, D-14513 Teltow, Germany
Matthias Heuchel
Affiliation:
GKSS Research Center, Institute of Chemistry, Kantstr. 55, D-14513 Teltow, Germany
Yuri Yampolskii
Affiliation:
Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, Russian Academy of Sciences, 29 Leninsky Pr., 117912 Moscow, Russia.
A. V. Topchiev
Affiliation:
Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, Russian Academy of Sciences, 29 Leninsky Pr., 117912 Moscow, Russia.
Get access

Abstract

The paper deals with important differences in the distribution of free volume in high and low free volume polymers as indicated by a joint investigation utilizing molecular modeling and positron annihilation lifetime (PALS) studies. The main focus of this paper is on the molecular modeling approach. The first set of polymers in question are the ultra-high free volume polymer poly(1–(trimethylsilyl)-1-propyne) (PTMSP) and two polystyrene derivatives containing Si and F. Extended equilibration procedures were necessary to obtain reasonable packing models for the polymers. The transition state Gusev-Suter Monte Carlo method was utilized to prove a reasonable agreement between simulated and measured diffusivity and solubility values for the model structures. The free volume distribution was analyzed for the validated packing models and compared with respective PALS data. In both cases a bimodal distribution of free volume was observed for PTMSP while the polystyrene derivatives as other conventional glassy polymers showed a more or less monomodal behavior. Good qualitative agreement is demonstrated between size distributions of free volume elements in these polymers obtained via molecular computer modeling and PALS experiments. In addition a series of conventional and high performance polyimides was considered. There a major result is that polyimides with conventional permeabilities for small molecules always show just a monomodal distribution of free volume element sizes in the radius range up to about 5 Å, while all polyimides with high permeabilities have a wider, often bimodal, distribution extending up to a radius between 6 and about 8 Å.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 752: Symposium AA – Membranes–Preparation, Properties and Applications , 2002 , AA7.4
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nagai, K., K., , Masuda, T., Nakagawa, T., Freeman, B. D., Pinnau, I., Progress in Polymer Science 26, 721 (2001).Google Scholar
2. Yampolskii, Yu. P., Korikov, A. P., Shantarovich, V. P., Nagai, K, Freeman, B. D., Masuda, T., Teraguchi, M., Kwak, G., Macromolecules 34, 1788 (2001).Google Scholar
3. Nagel, C., Schmidtke, E., Günther-Schade, K., Hofmann, D., Fritsch, D., Strunskus, T., and Faupel, F., Macromolecules 33, 2242 (2000).Google Scholar
4. Hofmann, D., Heuchel, M., Yampolskii, Yu., Khotimskii, V., and Shantarovich, V., Macromolecules 35, 2129 (2002).Google Scholar
5. Heuchel, M., and Hofmann, D., Desalination 144, 67 (2002).Google Scholar
6. Polymer User Guide, amorphous Cell Section, version 4.0.0, Molecular Simulations, San Diego, 1996 Google Scholar
7. Hofmann, D., Fritz, L., Ulbrich, J., Schepers, C., and Böhning, M., Macromol. Theory Simul. 9, 293 (2000).Google Scholar
8. Sun, H., and Rigby, D., Spectrochimica Acta, 53A, 1301 (1997).Google Scholar
9. Rigby, D., Sun, H., and Eichinger, B.E., Polymer International 44, 311 (1997).Google Scholar
10. Bohlen, J., Wolff, J., and Kirchheim, R., Macromolecules, 32, 3766 (1999).Google Scholar