Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T08:53:30.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Molecular Beam Epitaxy of Single Crystal Colossal Magneto-Resistive Material

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

J. N. Eckstein ,
I. Bozovic ,
M. Rzchowski ,
J. O'donnell ,
B. Hinaus  and
M. Onellion
J. N. Eckstein
Affiliation:
E.L. Ginzton Research Center, Varian Associates, Palo Alto, CA 94304
I. Bozovic
Affiliation:
E.L. Ginzton Research Center, Varian Associates, Palo Alto, CA 94304
M. Rzchowski
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
J. O'donnell
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
B. Hinaus
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
M. Onellion
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
Get access

Abstract

We have grown films of (LaSr)MnO3 (LSMO) and (LaCa)MnO3 (LCMO) using atomic layer-by-layer molecular beam epitaxy (ALL-MBE). Depending on growth conditions, substrate lattice constant and the exact cation stoichiometry, the films are either pseudomorphic or strain relaxed. The pseudomorphic films show atomically flat surfaces, with a unit cell terrace structure that is a replica of that observed on the slightly vicinal substrates, while the strain relaxed films show bumpy surfaces correlated with a dislocation network. All films show tetragonal structure and exhibit anisotropic magnetoresistance, with a low field response, (1/R)(dR/dH) as large as 5 T−1.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 401: Symposium G – Epitaxial Oxide Thin Films II , 1995 , 467
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kusters, R.M., Singleton, J., Keen, D.A., McGreevy, R., Hayes, W., Physica 155B, 362(1989).Google Scholar
2. Helmolt, R. von, Wecker, J., Holzapfel, B., Schultz, L., Samwer, K., Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2331(1993).Google Scholar
3. Hundley, M.F., Hawley, M., Heffner, R.H., Jia, Q.X., Neumeier, J.J., Tesmer, J., Thompson, J.D., Wu, X.D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 860(1995).Google Scholar
4. Millis, A.J., Littlewood, P.B., Shraiman, B.I., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 5144(1995).Google Scholar
5. Jin, S., Tiefel, T.H., McCormack, M., Fastnacht, R.A., Ramesh, R., Chen, L.H., Science 264, 413(1994).Google Scholar
6. Achutharaman, V.S., Kraus, P.A., Vas'ko, V.A., Nordman, C.A., Goldman, A.M., Appl. Phys Lett. 67, 1019(1995).Google Scholar
7. Rzchowski, M., Hinaus, B., Onellion, M., Eckstein, J.N., Bozovic, I., to be published in Phys Rev. B.Google Scholar
8. Eckstein, J.N., Bozovic, I., Annual Rev. Mat. Sci. (1995).Google Scholar