Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T08:36:12.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructural Variations in Sol-Gel Processed Lithium Niobate thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Vikram Joshi
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Dept. of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Grace K. Goo
Affiliation:
University of California at Irvine, Materials Science and Engineering Program, Irvine, CA 92717
Martha L. Mecartney
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Dept. of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Get access

Abstract

LiNbO3 thin films were deposited by dip coating Li-Nb alkoxide solutions onto silicate glass substrates and single crystal sapphire substrates. Microstructural characterization using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) showed significant differences in film microstructures dependent on the initial solution chemistry. Fully crystalline films could be obtained after heat treatments at 400°C in air. The grain size and porosity were dependent on the amount of water of hydrolysis in the alkoxide sol. The higher the water content, the larger the grain size and porosity. Crystallization studies of nucleation and growth of LiNbO3 for films heat treated from 300–600°C indicated that higher temperatures or long soak times generated large facetted grain structures. Single crystalline films were obtained on (0001) sapphire substrates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hirano, S. and Kato, K., J. Non-cryst. Solids 100, 538 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Castings, N. P., Duboudin, F., and Ravez, J., J. Mater. Res. 3, 557 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Hirano, S. and Kato, K., Advanced Ceramic Materials 2, 142 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Partlow, D. P. and Greggi, J., J. Mater. Res. 2 595 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Eichorst, D. J. and Payne, D. A., in Better Ceramics Through Chemistry IV. eds. Zelinski, B. J. J., Brinker, C. J., Clark, D. E., and Ulrich, D. R., (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 180, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990) p. 669.Google Scholar
6. Nashimoto, K. and Cima, M. J., Mat. Lett. 10, 348 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Joshi, V., Goo, G. K., and Mecartney, M. L., in Synthesis and Processing of Ceramics: Scientific Issues, eds. Rhine, W. E., Shaw, T. M., Gottschall, R. J., and Chen, Y. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 249, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992), p.459.Google Scholar
8. Norton, M. G., Summerfelt, S. R., and Carter, C. B., App. Phys. Lett. 56, 2246 (1990).Google Scholar