Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T01:08:00.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanochemical Synthesis, Structural Characterization and Visible Light Photocatalysis of TiO2/ZnFe2O4 Nnanocomposites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Sesha S. Srinivasan
Affiliation:
sesha@eng.usf.edu, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL, 33620, United States
Nikolai Kislov
Affiliation:
nikolai@eng.usf.edu
Jeremy Wade
Affiliation:
wadetbr@hotmail.com
Matthew Smith
Affiliation:
masmith@eng.usf.edu
Elias Stefanakos
Affiliation:
stefanak@eng.usf.edu
Yogi Goswami
Affiliation:
goswami@ufl.edu
Get access

Abstract

Nanocomposite heterogeneous semiconductors with suitable energy levels (gaps) are exhibiting excellent photocatalytic properties under visible light irradiation. TiO2/ZnFe2O4 has been selected among different alloys because of (i) its low band gap ∼1.9 eV (ii) the nontoxicity of ZnFe2O4 (iii) visible light absorption characteristics of ZnFe2O4 due to its narrow band gap and (iv) not being susceptible to photoanodic corrosion. A mechanochemical synthesis approach using high energy milling is employed to prepare TiO2/ZnFe2O4 under different experimental parameters and conditions. The effects of ball milling and calcination on the photocatalytic behavior of TiO2 and TiO2/ZnFe2O4 have been determined. The as-milled nanocomposite materials are characterized with PXD, SEM and EDS procedures. The photocatalytic activity of TiO2/ZnFe2O4 nanocomposites for the photodegradation of phenol under visible light irradiation has been studied systematically by UV-Vis spectrometer. It is interesting to note a red shift of 0.25 eV in the absorption edge of the ball-milled TiO2 sample when compared to the non ball milled TiO2 photocatalyst.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Serphone, N. and Pelizzetti, E., Photocatalysis Fundamentals and Applications, Wiley, New York (1989)Google Scholar
[2] Fox, M.A. and Dulay, M.T., Chem. Rev., 93, 341 (1993)Google Scholar
[3] Asahi, R., Morikawa, T., Aoki, K. and Taga, Y., Science, 293, 269 (2001)Google Scholar
[4] Anpo, M., Protecting the Environment, 75 (1998)Google Scholar
[5] Chengyu, W., Huamei, S., Ying, T., Tongsuo, T. and Guowu, Z., Separation and Purification Technology, 132, 357 (2003)Google Scholar
[6] Premkumar, J., Chemistry Materials, 16, 3980 (2004)Google Scholar
[7] Chen, X., Lou, Y., Samia, A.C.S., Burda, C. and Gole, J.L., Adv. Functional Materials, 15, 1, 41 (2005)Google Scholar
[8] Begin-Colin, S., Girot, T., Caer, G.L. and Mocellin, A., J. Solid State Chem., 149, 41 (2000)Google Scholar
[9] Hu, J., Qin, H., Sui, Z. and Lu, H., Materials Letter, 53, 421 (2002)Google Scholar
[10] Hidalgo, M.C., Colon, G. and Navio, J.A., J. Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 148, 341 (2002)Google Scholar
[11] Yuan, Z.H. and Zhang, L.D., Materials Chemistry, 11, 1265 (2001)Google Scholar
[12] Cheng, P., Li, W., Zhou, T., Jin, Y. and Gu, M., J. Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 168, 12, 97 (2004)Google Scholar
[13] Srinivasan, S.S., Wade, J., Stefanakos, E.K., Mater Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 876E, R 5.9 (2005)Google Scholar
[14] Zeng, Y., Liu, J., Wu, W. and Ding, C., Surface & Coating Technology, 200, 23982402 (2005)Google Scholar
[15] Suryanarayana, C. and Norton, M. Grant, X-ray Diffraction, A Practical Approach, Plenum Press, New York, 212213 (1998)Google Scholar