Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T15:02:18.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanical Behavior of a Ni/TiC Microlaminate Under Static and Fatigue Loading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Y. C. Her ,
P. C. Wang ,
J.-M. Yang  and
R. F. Bunshah
Y. C. Her
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095
P. C. Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095
J.-M. Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095
R. F. Bunshah
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095
Get access

Abstract

The mechanical behavior and damage mechanisms of the Ni/TiC microlaminate composites under static and cyclic loading were investigated. The relationship between the ultimate tensile strength and the layer thickness at both room temperature and 600°C was studied. The fatigue life and the evolution of the stiffness reduction under various maximum applied stress levels were determined. The results revealed that the ultimate tensile strength linearly increased as the laminate layer thickness decreased. Also, the microlaminate exhibited a non-progressive fatigue behavior.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 434: Symposium U – Layered Materials for Structural Applications , 1996 , 275
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Tsakalakos, T. and Hilliard, J.E., J. Appl. Phys. 54,734(1983)Google Scholar
2. Cammarata, R.C., Schlesinger, T.E., Kim, K., Qadri, S.B., and Edelstein, A.S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56,1862(1990)Google Scholar
3. Bunshah, R.F., Nimmagadda, R., and Doerr, H.J., The Solid Films, 72(1980) 261–275 Google Scholar
4. Yang, W.M.C., Tsakalakos, T. and Hilliard, J.E., J. Appl. Phys. 48,876(1977)Google Scholar
5. Vill, M., Adams, D.P., Yalisove, S.M., and Bilello, J.C., Acta. Metall. Mater. Vol.43,4. No.2,427(1995)Google Scholar
6. Movchan, B.A., Demchishin, A.V., Badilenko, G.F., Bunshah, R.F., Sans, C., Deshpandey, C. and Doerr, H.J., Thin solid films, 97(1982) 215–219 Google Scholar
7. Bunshah, R.F., Sans, C., Deshpandey, C., Doerr, H.J., Movchan, B.A., Demchishin, A.V., Badilenko, G.F., and Thin solid films, 96(1982) 59–66 Google Scholar
8. Rowe, R.G., Skelly, D.W., Larsen, M., Heathcote, J., Lucas, G., and Odette, G.R., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. vol.323, Boston. p.461, 1933 Google Scholar
9. Bunshah, R.F., Handbook of deposition technologies for films and coatings, p.211 (1994)Google Scholar