Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T14:22:41.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magneto-Optical Studies of GaAs-AlGaAs Modulation Doped Quantum Wells Under Hydrostatic Pressure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Weimin Zhou ,
Clive H. Perry  and
John M. Worlock
Weimin Zhou
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115
Clive H. Perry
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115
John M. Worlock
Affiliation:
Bell Communication Research, Red Bank, NJ 07701
Get access

Abstract

High pressure photoluminescence measurements on modulation doped GaAs-AlGaAs quantum well structures have been performed for the first time with applied magnetic fields up to 15 Tesla. We have observed Landau fans from interband transitions of the 2D free electron gas between 0 and 8.5 kbar. In this pressure range the electron effective mass in GaAs increased at the rate of 2.6% per kbar. Above 9 kbar, the free Landau transitions disappeared and bound magneto-exiton behaviour dominated the spectrum. The influence of pressure on the band-gaps causes a controlled trapping of the free electron from the GaAs well to Si donors (DX centers) in the AlGaAs layers. Above 9 kbar the pressure coefficient of the GaAs band gap was found to be 10.4 meV/kbar which is comparable to the accepted value in undoped GaAs quantum well structures.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 160 , 1989 , 697
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Venkaterswaran, U., , M. and Chandrasekhar, H.R, Wolfram, T., Fischer, R., Masselink, W.T. and Morkoc, H., Phys. Rev. B 31, 4106 (1985)Google Scholar
2Wolford, D.J., Kuesch, T.F., Bradley, J.A., Gell, M.A., Ninno, D. and Jams, M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B4, 1043 (1986)Google Scholar
3Lambkin, J.D., Adames, A.R., Dustan, D.J., Dawson, P. and Foxon, C.T., Phys. Rev. B 39, 5546 (1989)Google Scholar
4Weinstein, B.A., Hark, S.K. and Burnham, R.D., 18thInternational Conference on the Physics of Semiconductors, Vol.1. (Ed. Engstrom, O., World Scientific, Singapore, 1987) p. 707Google Scholar
5Mercy, J.M., Bousquet, C., Robert, J.L., Raymond, A., Gregoris, G., Beerens, J. and Linh, N.T., Surface Science, 142, 298 (1984)Google Scholar
6Perry, C.H., Weinstein, B.A, Hark, S.K., Mailhoit, C., 18thInternational Conference on the Physics of Semiconductors Vol.1 (Ed. Eigstrom, O., World Scientific, Singapore, 1987) p. 687; Superlattices and Microstructures, 3 273,(1987)Google Scholar
7Perry, C.H., Worlock, J.M., Smith, M.C. and Petrou, A., Solid State Sciences 71, 202,(1987)Google Scholar
8Adams, A.R., “Properties of Gallium Arsenide” EMIS Data Review Series N° 2, (INSPEC, London and N.Y., 1986), Chap. 6.5Google Scholar
9Chand, N., Handerson, T., Klem, J., Masselink, W.T. and Fischer, R., Phys. Rev. B 30, 4481(1984)Google Scholar
10Saxena, A.K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 36, 78,(1980)Google Scholar
11Shan, W., Yu, P.Y., Li, M.F., Hansen, W.L. and Bauser, E., Phys. Rev. B, 40, 7831,(1989)Google Scholar
12Adachi, S., J. Appl. Phys. 58, (3) (1985)Google Scholar