Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T06:38:09.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigation on the Immobilisation of Carbon in OPC-BFS and OPC-PFA Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Hajime Kinoshita
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Materials, The University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, U.K.
Paulo H. R. Borges
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Materials, The University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, U.K.
Claire A. Utton
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Materials, The University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, U.K.
Neil B. Milestone
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Materials, The University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, U.K.
Cyril Lynsdale
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

The reaction of CO2 gas with OPC, OPC-BFS and OPC-PFA composite cement systems were studied using XRD, SEM and TG to investigate the applicability of these materials to immobilise carbon arising from graphite waste. XRD results suggested that calcite formed in OPC system after the carbonation reaction, whereas calcite and vaterite were observed in OPCBFS and OPC-PFA systems. In OPC system, nearly half of Ca(OH)2 was consumed to form CaCO3. In OPC-BFS and OPC-PFA systems, the amount of CaCO3 formed, corresponded to the consumption of greater than 100% of Ca(OH)2 initially present, suggesting that other hydration products e.g. C-S-H were also consumed, either directly or indirectly during the carbonation process. The OPC-BFS system became more porous after carbonation. OPC-PFA system indicated a high efficiency on the conversion of Ca in the system into CaCO3.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bowry, M. and Handy, B. J., CoRWM Document 1453, (2005).Google Scholar
2 Stolaroff, J. K., Lowry, G. V. and Keith, D. W., Energy Conversion and Management, 46, 687699 (2005).Google Scholar
3 Iizuka, A., Fujii, M., Yamasaki, A., and Yanagisawa, Y., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 43, 78807887 (2004).Google Scholar
4 Bertos, M. Fernández, Simons, S. J. R., Hills, C. D. and Carey, P. J., J. Hazardous Mater. B 112, 193205 (2004).Google Scholar
5 Milestone, N. B., Bai, Y., Borges, P. R., Collier, N. C., Gorce, J. P., Gordon, L. E., Setiadi, A., Utton, C. A. and Zhou, Q., Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 932, 673680 (2006).Google Scholar
6 Maciejewski, M., Oswald, H. R. and Reller, A., Thermochimica Acta 234, 315328 (1994).Google Scholar
7 Stepkowska, E. T., Pérez-Rodríguez, J. L., Sayagués, M. J. and Martínez-Blanes, J. M., J. Thermal Anal. Calorimetry 73, 247269 (2003).Google Scholar
8 Alarcon-Ruiza, L., Platretb, G., Massieub, E. and Ehrlacher, A., Cement and Concrete Res. 35, 609613 (2005).Google Scholar
9 Vedalakshmi, R., Sundara Raj, A., Srinivasan, S., and Ganesh Babu, K., Thermochimica Acta 407, 4960 (2003).Google Scholar
10 Pane, I. and Hansen, W., Cement and Concrete Res. 35, 11551164 (2005).Google Scholar