Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T18:17:22.252Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigation of Differential Induced Attenuation of Orthogonal Axes in Polarization Maintaining Fibers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

M. E. Gingerich
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington DC 20375
S. J. Hickey
Affiliation:
SFA, Inc., Landover, MD 20785
C. C. Harrington
Affiliation:
SFA, Inc., Landover, MD 20785
M. J. Marrone
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington DC 20375
E. J. Friebele
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington DC 20375
L. D. Looney
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
J. R. Onstott
Affiliation:
3M Center, St. Paul, MN 55144
Get access

Abstract

Recent studies have indicated that the birefringent-inducing stress of polarization-maintaining (PM) fibers decreases the long term, permanent loss induced by ionizing radiation and that light polarized along the two orthogonal axes of PM fibers may be attenuated differently by exposure to irradiation sources. This paper reports the results of specific studies of this differential attenuation induced in a series of PM fibers by both steady state and transient irradiations. It has been found that the response to ionizing radiation depends on the materials properties of the fiber, i.e. the core and clad dopants and/or degree of stress, and that the magnitude of the differential attenuation is small relative to the total or one-axis incremental loss.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Friebele, E.J., Brambani, L.A., Askins, C.G., Gingerich, M.E. and Onstott, J.R., in Tech. Digest. OFC ′89, Paper WQ5 (Optical Society of America, Washington, DC, 1989). 117Google Scholar
2. Taylor, E.W., Wilson, V.R., Vigil, M.L., Lemire, R.A. and Thompson, E.E., IEEE Phot. Tech. Lett. 1, 248249 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Rashleigh, S.C., J. Lightwave Tech. LT–1, 312331 (1983); R.A. Bergh, H.C. Lefevre and H.J. Shaw, J. Lightwave Tech. LT-2, 91–107 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Marrone, M.J., Rashleigh, S.C., Friebele, E.J. and Long, K.J., Elect. Lett. 20, 193194 (1984).Google Scholar
5. Simpson, J.R., Stolen, R.H., Pleibel, W., Ritger, A.J., and Shang, H.T., in Fiber Optic Gyros: 10th Anniversary Conf., SPIE Vol.719 (SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 1986), pp. 220225.Google Scholar
6. Friebele, E.J., Askins, C.G., Gingerich, M.E., Shaw, C.M., and Schmidt, W.H., in Optical Fiber Materials and Processing, MRS Vol.172, edited by J.W. Fleming, G.H. Sigel, Jr., S. Takahashi, and P.W. France (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990).Google Scholar
7. Askins, C.G. and Marrone, M.J., J. Lightwave Tech. 6, 14021405 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. French, W.G., Jaeger, R.E., MacChesney, J.B., Nagel, S.R., Nassau, K. and Pearson, A.D., in Optical Fiber Telecommunications, edited by S.E., Miller and A.G., Chynoweth, (Academic Press, New York, 1979), pp. 233262.Google Scholar
9. Gingerich, M.E., Dorsey, K.L., Askins, C.G., and Friebele, E.J. in Optical Techniques for Sensing and Measurement in Hostile Envoirnments, SPIE Vol.787 (SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 1987), pp. 7783.Google Scholar