Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T09:55:06.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Internal Spatial Modes and Local Propagation Properties in Optical Waveguides Measured Using Near-Field Scanning Pptical Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Bennett B Goldberg
Affiliation:
Boston University Physics Department, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Photonics Center, Boston, MA 02215, goldberg@bu.edu
M. Selim Ünlü
Affiliation:
Boston University Physics Department, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Photonics Center, Boston, MA 02215, goldberg@bu.edu
Greg Vander Rhodes
Affiliation:
Boston University Physics Department, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Photonics Center, Boston, MA 02215, goldberg@bu.edu
Get access

Abstract

Near-field scanning optical microscopy has been used to measure the internal spatial modes and local properties controlling optical wave propagation in glass/silica buried waveguides. The period of the observed standing modes provides a direct measure of the effective index, which combined with the measured transverse modal shape and decay constants, determines the values of all spatial components of the wave vector.

Typically, small fluctuations in the material properties of structures can prevent proper operation as well as accurate diagnostic device modeling. The NSOM local probe measurements provide a means of detailed characterization, and defects in processing and their affects on performance are readily identified. We have also developed a technique that can obtain information about the locations of remote dielectric interfaces based upon the rate of change in the phase of the standing wave as a function of wavelength. Finally, experimental results addressing the issue of perturbation of the NSOM probe on the measurement of the local field shows a weak but measurable perturbation, and the dependence on aperture and material parameters will be discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ebeling, K. J., Integrated Optoelectronics, Springer-Verlag, New York, (1993).Google Scholar
2. Synge, E. H., “A suggested method for extending microscopic resolution into the ultramicroscopic region,” Phil. Mag., vol. 6, pp. 356362, (1928).Google Scholar
3. Pohl, D. W., Denk, W., and Lanz, M., “Optical Stethoscopy: Image Recording with Resolution 1/20,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 651653, (1984).Google Scholar
4. Betzig, E., Lewis, A., Harootunian, A., Isaacson, M., and Kratschmer, E., “Near-field Scanning Optical Microscopy (NSOM): Development and Biophysical Applications,” Biophys. J., vol. 49, pp. 268279, (1986).Google Scholar
5. McCaughan, L. and Bergmann, E. E., “Index Distribution of Optical Waveguides from Their Mode Profile,” J. Lightwave Tech., vol. 1, pp. 241, (1983).Google Scholar
6. Hoven, G. N. van den, Polman, A., Dam, C. van, Uffelen, J. W. M. van, and Smit, M. K., “Direct imaging of optical interferences in erbium-dopedA12O3 waveguides,” Optics Letters, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 576579, 15 April 1996.Google Scholar
7. Rogers, T. J., Deppe, D. G., and Streetman, B. G., “Effect of an AlAs / GaAs mirror on the spontaneous emission of an InGaAs-GaAs quantum well,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 57, no. 18, pp. 18581860, 29 October 1990.Google Scholar
8. Bums, S. E., Pfeffer, N., Gruner, J., Remmers, M., Javorek, T., Neher, D., and Friend, R. H., “Measurements of optical electric field intensities in microcavities using thin emissive polymer films,” Adv. Mater., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 395405, April 1997.Google Scholar
9. Tsai, D. P., Jackson, H. E., Reddick, R. C., Sharp, S. H., and Warmack, R. J., “Photon scanning tunneling microscope study of optical waveguides,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 56, no. 16, pp. 15151517, 16 April 1990.Google Scholar
10. Phillips, P. L., Knight, J. C., Mangan, B. J., St, P.. Russell, J., Charlton, M. D. B., and Parker, G. J., “Near-field optical microscopy of thin photonic crystal films,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 85, no. 9, pp. 63376342, 1 May 1999.Google Scholar
11. Bourzeix, S., Moison, J. M., Mignard, F., Barthe, F., Boccara, A. C., Licoppe, C., Mersali, B., Allovon, M., and Bruno, A., “Near-Field Optical Imaging of Light Propagation in Semiconductor Waveguide Structures,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 73, no. 8, pp. 10351037, 24 August 1998.Google Scholar
12. Tien, P. K., Gordon, J. P., and Whinnery, R., “Light waves in thin films and integrated optics,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 53, pp. 129, 1965.Google Scholar
13. Rhodes, G. H. Vander, Unlu, M. S., Goldberg, B. B., Pomeroy, J. M., and Krauss, T. F., “Characterisation of Waveguide Microcavities using High-resolution Transmission Spectroscopy and Near-field Scanning Optical Microscopy,” lEE Proc. Optoelectron., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 379383, (1998).Google Scholar
14. Little, B. E., Chu, S. T., Pan, W., Ripin, D., Kaneko, T., Kokubun, Y., and Ippen, E. P., “Vertically Coupled Glass Microring Resonator Channel Dropping Filters,” Phot. Tech. Lett., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 215217, February 1999.Google Scholar
15. Little, B. E., Foresi, J. S., Steinmeyer, G., Thoen, E. R., Chu, S. T., Haus, H. A., Ippen, E. P., Kimerling, L. C., and Greene, W., “Ultra-Compact Si-Si02 Microring Resonator Optical Channel Dropping Filters,” Phot. Tech. Lett., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 549551, April 1998.Google Scholar
16. Karrai, K. and Grober, R. D., “Piezoelectric Tip-Sample Distance Control for Near Field Optical Microscopes,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 66, no. 14, pp. 18421844, 1995.Google Scholar
17. Marcatelli, E. A. J., “Dielectric Rectangular Waveguide and Directional Coupler for Integrated Optics,” Bell Syst. Tech. J., vol. 48, pp. 20712102, 1969.Google Scholar
18. Lui, W. W., Xu, C. L., Huang, W. P., Yokoyama, K., and Seki, S., “Full-vectoral mode analysis with considerations of field singularities at comers of optical waveguides,” J. Lightwave Tech., vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 15091513, 1999.Google Scholar