Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:07:35.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interfacial Dynamics of Water-in-Oil Dropliets: a Temperature-Jump Investigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Paschalis Alexandridis
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Josef F. Holzwarth
Affiliation:
Fritz-Haber-Institut der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Faradayweg 4-6, Berlin, Germany.
T. Alan Hatton
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Get access

Abstract

The dynamic response of water-in-oil AOT microemulsion droplets to perturbations caused by rapid energy transfer has been interpreted in terms of the surfactant interface bending rigidity. The Iodine Laser Temperature Jump technique was used to rapidly (1 μs) increase the microemulsion temperature and thus disturb the system equilibrium. The dynamic relaxation to the new equilibrium position was monitored by measuring the turbidity of the microemulsion over a I ms time interval immediately after the temperature jump. The rate and direction of the turbidity change depended on the initial temperature, size and salt content of the water droplets. We observed characteristic times of 2 to 10 μs and attributed them to the relaxation of the surfactant interface. A bending modulus of 0.4 kT was derived for the AOT interface, using a model for the shape perturbation of a spherical interface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Zana, R. and Lang, I., in Microemulsions: Structure and Dynamics, edited by Friberg, S.E. and Bothorel, P. (CRC Press, 1988)Google Scholar
2. Meglio, J.-M. Di, Dvolaitzky, M., Ober, R., Taupin, C., I. Phys. Lett., 44, L229 (1983)Google Scholar
3. Guering, P. and Cazabat, A.-M., J. Phys. Lett., 44, L601 (1984)Google Scholar
4. Huang, J.S., Milner, S.T., Farago, B., Richter, D., Phys. Rev. Lett., 59, 2600 (1987)Google Scholar
5. Kotlarchyk, M., Stephens, R.B., Huang, I.S., J. Phys. Chem., 92, 1533 (1988)Google Scholar
6. Safran, S.A., J. Phys. Chem., 78, 2073 (1983)Google Scholar
7. Borkovec, M. and Eicke, H.-F., Chem. Phys. Lett., 157, 457 (1989)Google Scholar
8. Holzwarth, J.F., Schmidt, A., Wolff, H., Volk, R., I. Phys. Chem., 81, 2300 (1977)Google Scholar
9. Alexandridis, P., Holzwarth, J.F., Hatton, T.A. (submitted for publication)Google Scholar
10. Zulauf, M. and Eicke, H.-F., J. Phys. Chem., 83, 480 (1979)Google Scholar
11 Ricka, J., Borkovec, M., Hofmeier, U., J. Chem. Phys., 94, 8503 (1991)Google Scholar
12. Fletcher, P.D.I. and Holzwarth, J.F., J. Phys. Chem., 95, 2550 (1991)Google Scholar
13. Helfrich, W., Z. Natur., C28, 693 (1973)Google Scholar
14. Milner, S.T. and Safran, S.A., Phys. Rev. A, 36, 4371 (1987)Google Scholar
15. Linden, E.v.d., Bedeaux, D., Hilfiker, R., Eicke, H.-F., Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem., 95,876 (1991)Google Scholar