Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T23:18:28.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In-Situ TEM Observation of Electromigration Damage by Surface or Interface Diffusion in Al and Al Alloy Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

C. Y. Chang
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Solid State Science and Technology, Physics Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244-1130
R. W. Vook
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Solid State Science and Technology, Physics Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244-1130
Get access

Abstract

In-situ transmission electron microscope (TEM) electromigration damage (EMD) tests were performed on pure Al films which were thermally evaporated onto oxidized silicon wafers under different deposition conditions. Three different aluminum alloy films, Al-2wt%Cu, Al-8wt%Cu, and Al-2wt%Cu-lwt%Si were also examined. TEM images were recorded photographically and by a video camcorder. The sample stripes were stressed by a high DC current density (≈1.5 MA/cm2). A linear temperature ramp (5°C/min) was supplied by an external, computer controlled heater. The morphology of EMD-induced voids was found to be strongly dependent on microstructure. In small grain size Al stripes, EMD occurred by the formation of void “fingers” which propagated in an almost random manner. In large grain size Al and Al alloy stripes, the EMD-elongated voids propagated approximately parallel to each other and along the field direction. They were preceded with clearly identifiable local thinning. The thinned regions often had crystallographic edges. Contrary to the commonly held belief that EMD occurs only by a grain boundary diffusion mechanism, the present study clearly shows that surface or interface diffusion was the dominant, latter stage EMD failure mode in large grain size films.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. d'Heurle, F.M. and Ho, P.S. in Thin Films-Interdiffusion and Reactions, edited by Poate, J.M., Tu, K.N., and Mayer, J. W., (John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1978) pp.243.Google Scholar
2. Lloyd, J.R., Appl. Phys. Lett., 57, 1167 (1990)Google Scholar
3. Staszewski, G.G. Mahr Von and Reca, N.E. Walsö de, Phys. Stat. Sol. (a), 90, 191 (1985)Google Scholar
4. Black, J.R., IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, ED–16, 338 (1969)Google Scholar
5. Horowitz, S.J. and Blech, I.A., Mater. Sci. Eng., 10, 169 (1972)Google Scholar
6. Blech, I.A. and Meieran, E.S., J. Appl. Phys., 40, 485 (1969)Google Scholar
7. Berenbaum, L., J. Appl. Phys., 42, 880 (1971)Google Scholar
8. Vávra, I. and Lobotka, P., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a), 65, K107 (1981)Google Scholar
9. Vávra, I. and Lobotka, P., Zachar, F., and Osvald, J., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a), 63, 363 (1981)Google Scholar
10. Lobotka, P. and Vávra, I., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a),63, 655 (1981)Google Scholar
11. Chang, C.Y. and Vook, R.W., to appear in J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A, May/June (1991)Google Scholar
12. Chang, C.Y. and Vook, R.W., J. Mater. Res., 4, 1172 (1989)Google Scholar
13. Chang, C.Y., Vankar, V.D., Lee, Y.C., Vook, R.W., Patrinos, A.J., and Schwarz, J.A., Vacuum, 41, 1434 (1990)Google Scholar
14. Wells, O.C., Appl. Phys. Lett., 19, 232 (1971)Google Scholar
15. Ainslie, N.G., d'Heurle, F.M. and Wells, O.C., Appl. Phys. Lett., 20, 173 (1972)Google Scholar
16. Thomas, R.W., and Calabrese, D.W., IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium, pp.1 (1983)Google Scholar
17. Rosenberg, R. and Berenbaum, L., Appl. Phys. Lett., 12, 201 (1968)Google Scholar
18. Ichihawa, M. and Doi, T., Vacuum, 41, 933 (1990)Google Scholar