Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T21:03:08.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Redox Condition in Iron, Silicon and Hydrogen Contents of Leached Glass Surface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

A. Manara
Affiliation:
Commission of the European Communities, Joint Research Centre Ispra Establishment, 21020 Ispra (Va), Italy
F. Lanza
Affiliation:
Commission of the European Communities, Joint Research Centre Ispra Establishment, 21020 Ispra (Va), Italy
G. Della Mea
Affiliation:
Commission of the European Communities, Joint Research Centre Ispra Establishment, 21020 Ispra (Va), Italy
C. Rossi
Affiliation:
Commission of the European Communities, Joint Research Centre Ispra Establishment, 21020 Ispra (Va), Italy
G. Salvagno
Affiliation:
Commission of the European Communities, Joint Research Centre Ispra Establishment, 21020 Ispra (Va), Italy
Get access

Abstract

Surface analysis has been conducted on samples leached in a Sochlet apparatus at 100°C in the presence and in the absence of air. The XPS technique was applied to analyse the content of iron and silicon while the nuclear reaction method was utilized to analyse the content of hydrogen. Samples leached in argon atmosphere have shown a smaller content of iron and silicon with respect to the samples leached in air atmosphere. The H concentration has shown the same behaviour. The results are discussed in terms of possible formation of iron compounds in the different redox condition and of their different stabilities and in terms of their efficiency in reducing exchange between Na+ and H+ ions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

.1 Houser, C. A., Tsong, I. S. T. and White, W. B., Scientific basis for nuclear waste management VI (1979) 131 139.Google Scholar
2. Sales, B. C., Boatner, L.A., Naramoto, H. and White, C. W., Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 53 (1982) 201226.Google Scholar
3. Pederson, L. R., Thomas, M. T. and McVay, G. L., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 18 (3) April 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. McVay, G.L., Buckwalter, C.Q., PNL.-Sa-10474 (May 1982).Google Scholar
5. Houser, C. A., Tsong, I.S. T., White, W. B., Winterberg, A. L., Miller, P. D. and Moak, C. D., Radiation Effects 64 (1982) 103108.Google Scholar
6. McVay, G. L. and Buckwalter, C.Q., Nuclear Technology 51 (1980) 123129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. McVay, G. L., Pederson, L. R., PNL-SA-9016 (1980).Google Scholar
8. Lanza, F., Parnisari, E., Nucl. and Chem. Waste MaLnag. 2 131 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Lanford, W.A., Nucl. Inst. Meth. 149 (1978) 1939.Google Scholar
10. Engelmann, C., Neus, B., Trocellier, P., Verres Refract. 35 3 (1981)486.Google Scholar
11. Mclntyre, N.S. and Zetaruk, D.G., Anal. Chem. 49 1521 (1977).Google Scholar