Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T02:38:14.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Cu Deposition Conditions on The Microstructure and Adhesion of Cu/Cr Thin Film To Polyimide Film

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Cheol-Ho Joh
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, KOREA, kimyh@hyunp1.hanyang.ac.kr
Young-Ho Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, KOREA, kimyh@hyunp1.hanyang.ac.kr
Get access

Abstracts

The microstructure of Cu thin films in various deposition conditions and the influence of their microstructure on the adhesion strength between Cu/Cr films and polyimides were studied. Cr films (50 nm thick) and Cu films (500 or 1000 nm thick) were deposited on polyimide films by DC magnetron sputtering. The Ar pressure during Cu deposition was controlled to 5, 50, and 100 mtorr. The microstructure was characterized using SEM and TEM. The adhesion strength between Cu/Cr and polyimide was measured using a modified Tpeel test. Plastic deformation of the peeled metal was qualitatively measured using the XRD technique. The Cu film sputtered at 5 mtorr has a dense and uniform structure, while lowdensity regions or open boundaries between columns exist in the film deposited at higher pressure. As sputtering pressure increases, open boundaries are observed more frequently. The peel adhesion strength of Cr film to polyimide increases with Cu sputtering pressure. The adhesion change of Cu/Cr film can be interpreted as the difference in plastic deformation. Open boundaries in the Cu film seem to play an important role in increasing the amount of plastic deformation in the metal film during peeling.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Steinmann, P.A. and Hintermann, H.E., J. Vac. Sci. Tchnol., 7, 2276 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Aravas, N., Kim, K.S., and Loukis, M.J., Mater. Sci. Eng., 107, 159 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Kim, J., Kim, K.S., and Kim, Y.-H., J. Adhesion Sci. Technol., 3, 175 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Lim, J.H., Lee, T.G., and Kim, Y.-H., The Second Pacific Rim International Conference on Advanced Materials and Processing, 2, 1127 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Thornton, J.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 11, 666 (1974).Google Scholar
6. Lim, J.H., Kim, Y.-H., and Han, S.H., J. Kor. Inst. Surf. Eng., 26, 327 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Craig, S. and Harding, G.L., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 19, 205 (1981).Google Scholar
8. Ohring, M., The Materials Science of Thin Films, (Academic Press, San Diego, 1991) p. 225.Google Scholar
9. Joh, C.-H., and Kim, Y.-H., to be published.Google Scholar
10. Cullity, B.D., Elements of X-ray Diffraction, 2nd ed., (Addison Wesley, Reading, 1978) p. 249 Google Scholar