Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:15:19.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Carbon on the Diffusion of Interstitials and Boron in Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Mark E. Law
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of FloridaGainesville, FL 32611-6130, U.S.A
Michelle D. Griglione
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of FloridaGainesville, FL 32611-6130, U.S.A
Misty Northridge
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of FloridaGainesville, FL 32611-6130, U.S.A
Get access

Abstract

Carbon is a native impurity in Si which is known to trap self-interstitials and decrease their diffusivity. Carbon has also been observed to decrease B transient enhanced diffusion (TED) in Si through these interstitial interactions. Recently it has been proposed that vacancies must also be considered when accounting for the reduction of B TED. We have incorporated both the kick-out mechanism and the Frank-Turnbull (F-T) mechanism in simulations of interstitial diffusion and carbon diffusion, as well as experiments involving B diffusion in B doped superlattices (DSLs) with varying C concentration regions. We have used the binding energy between a carbon atom and a self-interstitial as a basis for the reaction rates for both mechanisms, and have found that an single energy of 2.25 eV best reproduces the results from several experiments, assuming equilibrium initial conditions for both mechanisms and ab-initio equilibrium values for all point defects.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Newman, R.C. and Wakefield, J., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 19, 230 (1961).10.1016/0022-3697(61)90032-4Google Scholar
2. Rollert, F., Stolwijk, N.A., and Mehrer, H., Mater. Sci. Forum 38–41, 753 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Werner, P., Gossmann, H.-J., Jacobson, D.C., and Gösele, U., Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 2465 (1998).10.1063/1.122483Google Scholar
4. Rücker, H., Heinemann, B., Röpke, W., Kurps, R., Krüger, D., Lippert, G., and Osten, H. J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 1682 (1998).10.1063/1.122244Google Scholar
5. Scholz, R., Gosele, U., Huh, J.-Y., and Tan, T.Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 200 (1998).10.1063/1.120684Google Scholar
6. Fahey, P.M., Griffin, P.B., and Plummer, J.D., Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 289 (1989).10.1103/RevModPhys.61.289Google Scholar
7. Scholz, R.F., Werner, P., Gösele, U., and Tan, T.Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 392 (1999).10.1063/1.123081Google Scholar
8. Tang, M., Colombo, L., Zhu, J., and Rubia, T. Diaz de la, Phys. Rev. B 55, (1997).Google Scholar
9. Tipping, A.C. and Newman, R.C., Semi. Sci. Tech. 2, 315 (1987).10.1088/0268-1242/2/5/013Google Scholar
10. Gossmann, H.-J., Gilmer, G.H., Rafferty, C.S., Unterwald, F.C., Boone, T., Poate, J.M., Luftman, H.S., and Frank, W., J. Appl. Phys. 77, 1948 (1995).10.1063/1.358828Google Scholar
11. Gossmann, H.-J., Rafferty, C.S., Unterwald, F.C., Boone, T., Mogi, T.K., Thompson, M.O., and Luftman, H.S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 1558 (1995).10.1063/1.114733Google Scholar