Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:35:25.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indenter Geometry Effects on The Measurement of Mechanical Properties by Nanoindentation with Sharp Indenters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

T. Y. Tsui ,
W. C. Oliver  and
G. M. Pharr
T. Y. Tsui
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Rice University, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77005
W. C. Oliver
Affiliation:
Nanoinstruments Inc., 1001 Larson Drive, Oak Ridge, TN 37830
G. M. Pharr
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Rice University, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77005
Get access

Abstract

The measurement of mechanical properties by nanoindentation methods is most often conducted using indenters with the Berkovich geometry (a triangular pyramid) or with a sphere. These indenters provide a wealth of information, but there are certain circumstances in which it would be useful to make measurements with indenters of other geometries. We have recently explored how the measurement of hardness and elastic modulus can be achieved using sharp indenters other than the Berkovich. Systematic studies in several materials were conducted with a Vickers indenter, a conical indenter with a half-included tip angle of 70.3°, and the standard Berkovich indenter. All three indenters are geometrically similar and have nominally the same area-to-depth relationship, but there are distinct differences in the behavior of each. Here, we report on the application of these indenters in the measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by nanoindentation methods and some of the difficulties that occur.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 436: Symposium CC – Thin Films Stresses and Mechanical Properties VI , 1996 , 147
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Pharr, G.M. and Oliver, W.C., MRS Bull. XVII, 28 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Field, J.S. and Swain, M.V., J. Mater. Res. 8, 297 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Field, J.S. and Swain, M.V., J. Mater. Res. 10, 101 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Anstis, G.R., Chantikul, P., Lawn, B.R., and Marshall, D.B., J. Am. Cer. Soc. 63, 574 (1980).Google Scholar
6. Johnson, K.L., Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1985).Google Scholar
7. Giannakopoulos, A.E., Larsson, P.L. & Vestergaard, R., Int. J. Solids Struct. 31, 2679 (1994).Google Scholar
8. Bhattacharya, A.K. and Nix, W.D., Int. J. Solids Structures 24, 1287 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Larsen, T.A. and Simo, J.C., J. Mater. Res. 7, 618 (1992).Google Scholar
10. Bolshakov, A., Oliver, W.C., and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 11, 760 (1996).Google Scholar
11. Tsui, T.Y. and Pharr, G.M., in preparation.Google Scholar
12. Simmons, G. and Wang, H., Single Crystal Elastic Constants and Calculated Aggregate Properties: A Handbook, 2nd ed. (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1971).Google Scholar
13. Ma, Q. and Clarke, D.R., J. Mater. Res. 10, 853 (1995).Google Scholar
14. Page, T.F., Oliver, W.C. and McHargue, C.J., J. Mater. Res. 7, 450 (1992).Google Scholar