Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T03:11:08.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High-Density Production of Carbon Nanotubes in Contact Arc-Discharge at Low Helium Pressure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Dan Zhou
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
Su Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
Supapan Seraphin
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
James C. Withers
Affiliation:
Materials Electrochemical Research Corp., 7960 S Kolb Rd, Tucson, AZ 85706
Get access

Abstract

We report here on the structural properties of carbon nanotubes prepared by contact arc-discharge at low helium pressure of 100 torr. In contrast to the conventional arcdischarge, the contact discharge reduces the gap between the electrodes to a minimum value while still maintaining a plasma. The resulting carbonaceous deposit on the cathode surface, with the contact discharge operating under 100 torr helium atmosphere, contains the columnar structures with high density carbon nanotubes. These columnar structures are several millimeters in length, much longer than those generated under the conventional arc-discharge. These experimental results reveal that reducing the gap adds greater stability to the arc-discharge and establishes conditions that favor high-density nanotube growth under a low helium pressure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Krätschmer, W., Lamb, L. D., Fostiropoulos, K., and Huffman, D. R., Nature 347, 354 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Iijima, S., Nature 354, 56 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Ebbesen, T. W. and Ajayan, P. M., Nature 358, 220 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Iijima, S. and Ichihashi, T., Nature 363, 603 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Bethune, D. S., Klang, C. H., Vries, M. S. de, Gorman, G., Savoy, R., Vazquez, J., and Beyers, R., Nature 363, 605 (1993)Google Scholar
6. Seraphin, S. and Zhou, D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 2087 (1994).Google Scholar
7. Seraphin, S., Zhou, D., Jiao, J., Withers, J. C., and Loutfy, R., Nature 362, 503 (1993).Google Scholar
8. Seraphin, S., Zhou, D., Jiao, J., Withers, J. C., and Loutfy, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 2073 (1993).Google Scholar
9. Ebbesen, T. W., Ajayan, P. M., Hlura, H., and Tanigaki, K., Nature 367, 519 (1994).Google Scholar
10. Smalley, R. E., Mater. Scie. Eng., B19, 1 (1993).Google Scholar
11. Seraphin, S., Zhou, D., Jiao, J., Withers, J. C., and Loutfy, R., Carbon 31, 685 (1993).Google Scholar