Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T05:14:38.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth and Characterization of the Binary Defect Alloy Cu2-xSe and the Relation to II–VI/I–III–VI Heterojunction Formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Art J. Nelson
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO 80401
K. Sinha
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO 80401
John Moreland
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO 80303
Get access

Abstract

Synchrotron radiation soft x-ray photoemission spectroscopy was used to investigate the development of the electronic structure at the CdS/Cu2Se heterojunction interface. Cu2−xSe layers were deposited on GaAs (100) by molecular beam epitaxy from Cu2Se sources. Raman spectra reveal a strong peak at 270 cm−1, indicative of the Cu2−xSe phase. Atomic force microscopy reveals uniaxial growth in a preferred (100) orientation. CdS overlayers were then deposited in-situ, at room temperature, in steps on these epilayers. Photoemission measurements were acquired after each growth in order to observe changes in the valence band electronic structure as well as changes in the Se3d and Cd4d core lines. The results were used to correlate the interfacial chemistry with the electronic structure and to directly determine the CdS/Cu2−xSe and heterojunction valence band discontinuity and the consequent heterojunction band diagram. These results are compared to the valence band offset (ΔEv) for the CdS/CuInSe2 heterojunction interface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Tuttle, J.R., Contreras, M., Tennant, A., Duda, A., Carapella, J., Albin, D., and Noufi, R., Proceedings of the 11th PV AR&D Review Meeting, Denver, CO, AIP Conference Proceedings No. 268, 186 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Nelson, A.J., Tuttle, J.R., Noufi, R., Rioux, D., and Hochst, Hartmut, J. Appl. Phys. 74, 5757 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Schmid, D., Ruckh, M., Grunwald, F., and Schock, H.W., J. Appl. Phys. 73, 2902 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Schock, W.H., 10th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Lisbon (1991) p.777.Google Scholar
5. Gabor, A.M., Tuttle, J.R., Contreras, M.A., Albin, D.S., Noufi, R., and Hermann, A.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 198 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Nelson, A.J., Bode, M.H., Homer, G.S., Sinha, K. and Moreland, John in Compound Semiconductor Epitaxy, edited by Tu, C.W., Kolodziejski, L.A., and McCrary, V.R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 340, San Francisco, CA, 1994) pp. 599603.Google Scholar
7. Sorokin, G.P., IZV. Vyssh. Ucheb. Zaved. Fizika No. 4, 140 (1965).Google Scholar
8. Zhong, Q., Innis, D., Kjoller, K., and Elings, V.B., Surf. Sci. Lett. 290, L688 (1993).Google Scholar
9. Yamanaka, Satoshi, Tanda, Masayuki, Nakada, Nobuyuki, Yamada, Akira, Konagai, Makoto, and Takahashi, Kiyoshi, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 30(3), 442 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Tanino, H., Maeda, T., Fujikake, H., Nakanishi, H., Endo, S., and Irie, T., Phys. Rev. B45, 13323 (1992).Google Scholar
11. Rincón, C. and Ramírez, F.J., J. Appl. Phys. 72, 4321 (1992).Google Scholar
12. Höchst, H., Niles, D.W., and Hernandez-Calderon, I., Phys. Rev. B40, 8370 (1989).Google Scholar
13. Chen, Wen S., Stewart, J.M. and Mickelsen, R.A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 46(11), 1095 (1985).Google Scholar
14. Katnani, A.D. and Margaritondo, G., Phys. Rev. B28, 1944 (1983).Google Scholar
15. Nelson, A.J., Niles, D.W., Schwerdtfeger, C.R., Wei, Su-Huai, Zunger, A., and Hochst, Hartmut, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Electron Spectroscopy, Kiev, Ukraine, J. Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena 64 /65 (1994) 185.Google Scholar
16. Löher, T., Jaegermann, W., and Pettenkofer, C., J. Appl. Phys. 77, 731 (1995).Google Scholar