Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T03:38:59.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gas Density in Helium Bubbles in Nickel and Iron Determined by Small Angle Neutron Scattering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

D. Schwahn*
Affiliation:
Institut für Festkörperforschung der Kernforschungsanlage Jülich GmbH Postfach 1913, D-5170 Jülich, Federal Republic of, Germany
Get access

Abstract

A general discussion of the gas density determination of He bubbles in Ni and Fe with neutron scattering using the contrast variation method is given. One finds, that best results are obtained using isotope combinations for Ni, and magnetic and nuclear scattering for Fe. An experiment to determine the density of He in Ni demonstrates the applicability of this method.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Ullmaier, H., Nuclear Fusion 24, 1039 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Schwahn, D., Ullmaier, H., Schelten, J., and Kesternich, W., Acta Metall. 31, 2003 (1983).Google Scholar
[3] Kesternich, W., Schwahn, D., and Ullmaler, H., Scripta Metall. 18, 1011 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Schwaln, D., Kesternich, W., Spooner, S., Schober, H., Ullmaier, H. and Schelten, J. in Atomic Transport and Defects in Metals by Neutron Scattering, edited by Janot, C., Petry, W., Richter, D., and Springer, T. (Springer Proceedings in Physics 10, 1986) pp. 197203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Li, Qiang, Kesternich, W., Schroeder, K., Schwahn, D., and Ullmaier, H., Submitted to publication.Google Scholar
[61 Trinkaus, H., Rad. Effects 78, 189 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Trinkaus, H., Scripta Metall. 23, 1773 (1989).Google Scholar
[8] Bacon, G.E., Neutron Diffraction, 3rd ed (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1975), pp. 3941 and 211.Google Scholar