Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T03:36:48.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fabrication and Evaluation of Plasma-Sprayed Microlaminated Thermal Barrier Coatings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

A.M. Ritter
Affiliation:
GE Corporate Research & Development, P.O. Box 8, Schenectady, NY 12301
J.R. Rairden
Affiliation:
GE Corporate Research & Development, P.O. Box 8, Schenectady, NY 12301
R.L. Mehan
Affiliation:
GE Corporate Research & Development, P.O. Box 8, Schenectady, NY 12301
Get access

Abstract

Microlaminated metal matrix (M3 ) composite coatings of MCrAlY/Al2O3 were fabricated using coordinated two-gun low pressure plasma deposition rocessing. These coatings are shown to hold promise as durable thermal barrier coatings (TBC's) for aircraft engine applications. The properties of analogous M3 coatings of MCrAlY/Zr)2 Y2O3 also were evaluated and found to be significantly less durable when thermplly cycled.

Microstructural analysis of the M3 coatings revealed that no interaction occurred between the alumina and metal lamellae in the MCrAlY/Al2O3 TBC's. However, alumina and chromia layers formed at the metal/ceramic interfaces in the ZrO2-containing TBC's, and grew into the metal layers of the ZrO2-containing TBC's during air-cycling. This growth may contribute to TBC cracking and spallation by lowering the overall coating ductility.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Rairden, J.R. and Gray, D.M., GE Corporate Research & Development, Report No. 88CRD147 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Bunshah, R.F., Deshpandey, C.V. and O'Brien, B.P., presented at the Thermal Barrier Coatings Conference, NASA-Lewis, Cleveland, OH, 1985 (unpublished).Google Scholar
3. Siemers, P.A. and Mehan, R.L., Cer.Eng.Soc. Proc. 4 (American Ceramic Society, Columbus, OH, 1983), p.828.Google Scholar
4. Strangman, T.E., Thin Solid Films 127, 93 (1985).Google Scholar
5. Miller, R.A., Smialek, J.L. and Garlick, R.G., Advances in Ceramics, Vol.3 (American Ceramic Society, Columbus, OH, 1981) p.241 Google Scholar
6. Iwamoto, N. and Umesaki, N., Thin Solid-Films 127, 129 (1985).Google Scholar
7. Shinde, S.L., Olson, D.A., DeJhonge, L.C. and Miller, R.A., Proc. 10th Annual Conf. on Composites & Advanced Ceramic Materials (American Ceramic Society, Columbus, OH, 1986) p. 1032.Google Scholar
8. Miller, R.A. and Lowell, C.E., Thin Solid Films 95, 265 (1982).Google Scholar
9. Zaplatynsky, I., Thin Solid Films 95, 275 (1982).Google Scholar
10. Hillery, R.V., Pilsner, B.H., Cook, T.S. and Kim, K.S., NASA Report No. CR-179504 (NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, 1986).Google Scholar
11. DeMasi-Marcin, J.T., Sheffler, K.D. and Bose, S., presented at Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, Toronto, Canada, 1989 (unpublished).Google Scholar