Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-p566r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T15:55:53.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

European White Glass Trade Beads as Chronological and Trade Markers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

R.G.V. Hancock
Affiliation:
SLOWPOKE Reactor Facility and Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, M5S 3E5, hancock@chemeng.toronto.edu
S. Aufreiter
Affiliation:
SLOWPOKE Reactor Facility and Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, M5S 3E5, hancock@chemeng.toronto.edu
I. Kenyon
Affiliation:
Ontario Heritage Foundation, 10 Adelaide Street East, Toronto, Canada, M5C 1J3
Get access

Abstract

European explorers and traders, on their arrival in North America, found the aboriginal peoples willing to exchange furs and other goods for European-made metal objects and glass beads, the remains of which may be found at archaeological sites. Specific trade goods, including multi-coloured or curiously shaped glass beads that are visually distinctive, are used as chronological markers by archaeologists. Most of the single coloured, mainly blue or opaque white beads are very common and cannot be visually, chronologically differentiated. Non-destructive analysis (INAA) of turquoise blue or white beads from known-age archaeological sites in Ontario has revealed chemical changes in glass manufacturing compositions over time. This allows these otherwise nondescript, single coloured beads to be used as chronological and trade markers. Although the turquoise beads were always coloured by Cu, the white beads employed different opacifiers over time. First came Sn-rich beads (early to late 17th century); then Sb-rich beads (late 17th century to mid-19th century); finally As-rich beads (very late 18th century to early 20th century) and even F-whitened beads (19th century to 20th century). Within each major group, it appears that changes in glass making recipes may be found using the Na, K, Ca, Al and Cl contents. Therefore, chemical analysis of white glass trade beads may be as profitable as chemical analysis of turquoise blue trade beads in establishing chemical chronologies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Kidd, K.E. and Kidd, M.A., Canadian Historic Sites: Occasional Papers in Archaeology and History, 1, 4589 (1970).Google Scholar
[2] Karklins, K., in Glass Beads, Studies in Archaeology, Architecture and History, (National Historic Parks and Sites Branch, Parks Canada, Environment Canada, 1985), p. 85.Google Scholar
[3] Pratt, P.P., Oneida Iroquois Glass Trade Bead Sequence 1585–1745, (Fort Stanwix Museum, Rome, New York, 1961).Google Scholar
[4] Hayes, C.F. III, (editor), Proceedings of the 1982 Glass Trade Bead Conference, (Rochester Museum and Science Center, Rochester, 1983), 16.Google Scholar
[5] Kenyon, I.T. and Kenyon, T.A., in Proceedings of the 1982 Glass Trade Bead Conference edited by Hayes, C.F. III, (Rochester Museum & Science Center, Rochester, 1983) 16, pp. 5974.Google Scholar
[6] Karklins, K., in Proceedings of the 1982 Glass Trade Bead Conference, edited by Hayes, C.F. III, (Rochester Museum & Science Center, Rochester, 1983), 16, pp. 111126.Google Scholar
[7] Lewis, T.L., Neutron Activation Analysis of Glass Trade Beads, 1979 (unpublished).Google Scholar
[8] Hancock, R.G.V., Chafe, A. and Kenyon, I., Archaeometry 36, 253 (1994).Google Scholar
[9] Kenyon, I., Hancock, R.G.V. and Aufreiter, S., S., Archaeometry 37, 323 (1995).Google Scholar
[10] Hancock, R.G.V., Aufreiter, S., Moreau, J.-F. and Kenyon, I., in Archaeological Chemistry: Organic, Inorganic and Biochemical Analysis, edited by Orna, M.V., (American Chemical Society, Washington, 1996), pp. 2336.Google Scholar
[11] Hancock, R.G.V., J. Internat. Instit. of Conserv. - Canadian Group., 3, 21 (1978).Google Scholar
[12] Douglas, R.W. and Frank, S., A History of Glassmaking, (Foulis, G.T., Henley-on-Thames, 1972).Google Scholar