Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:55:30.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Encapsulation of Radioiodine in Cementitious Waste Forms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

M. Atkins  and
F.P. Glasser
M. Atkins
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Aberdeen, Meston Walk, Old Aberdeen AB9 2UE, U.K.
F.P. Glasser
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Aberdeen, Meston Walk, Old Aberdeen AB9 2UE, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

Risk assessment models applied to radioactive waste repository design disclose that iodine is one of the nuclides causing most concern. Computer calculations for these scenario studies assume that iodine, in the form of I−, is poorly sorbed on most geological materials. Therefore it is important that iodine be retained at source, ie. within the vault, for as long as is practicable.

In the UK context, cements are likely to form a major part of the waste package for low and medium active wastes, and of engineered vault structures. These cements are likely to be blends of one form or another, including Portland cement blended with blast furnace slag, or fly ash. It is therefore important to assess the effect of Portland cement and blending agent on iodine speciation and uptake by the constituent solid phases. Data are presented on the uptake of I− on specific phases: Ca(OH)2, calcium aluminate sulphate hydrates, hydrotalcite and calcium silicate hydrogel (C-S-H). Combining this with a model for predicting phase assemblages in well-aged slag cements, yields an optimum blend for immobilising radioiodide, on ageing.

Precipitation of I as AgI during cementation and radiolytic effects on I are also discussed. The production of gaseous radioiodine (I2) is potentially a serious problem.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 176: Symposium U – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIII , 1989 , 15
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Nagra Report Project Gewahr (1985).Google Scholar
2. Thompson, G.B.J. and Broyd, T.W., DOE Report DOE/RW/86.076 (1986).Google Scholar
3.see Liu, Y. and Gunten, H.R. von, Nagra Report 88–29 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Heitanen, R., Jaakkola, T. and Miettinen, J.K., in ‘Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII’, MRS Proc. 44, p.891–898, (1985).Google Scholar
5. Allard, B., Eliasson, L., Hoglund, S. and Andersson, K., KBS Report 84–15, (1984).Google Scholar
6. Andersson, K., Torstenfelt, B. and Allard, B., in ‘Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VII’, p.235–242, (1981).Google Scholar
7. Glasser, F.P. et al, DOE Report to be published.Google Scholar
8. Sugawara, K. and Terada, K., Nature 182, p.250–1, (1958).Google Scholar
9. Smith, J.D. and Buttler, E.C.V., Nature 277, p.468–9, (1979).Google Scholar
10. Atkins, M., Macphee, D.E. and Glasser, F.P., in ‘Proc. Third Int. Conf. Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag, Natural Pozzolans in Cocrete’, Vol.1, p.73–95, (1989).Google Scholar
11. Sharland, S.M., Tasker, P.W. and Tweed, C.J., in ‘Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management X’, p.683–694, (1987).Google Scholar
12. Glasser, F.P., Rahman, A.A., Macphee, D., Atkins, M., Beckley, N. and Carson, S., CEC Report F1 1W O025UK(H), May-Dec. 1986.Google Scholar
13. Luke, K. and Glasser, F.P., Il Cemento 85, p.179–192, (1988).Google Scholar
14. Brown, D.R. and Grutzeck, M.W., in ‘Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII’, MRS Proc. 44, p.911–918, (1985).Google Scholar
15.pers. obs.Google Scholar
16. Wilding, C.R. and McHugh, G., Report No. AERE 12297, Harwell, UK, 16pp., (1986).Google Scholar
17. Miyata, S., Clays and Clay Minerals 31, p.305–311, (1983).Google Scholar
18. Mascolo, G., Cem. Concr. Res. 16, p.610–612, (1986).Google Scholar
19. Glasser, F.P., Macphee, D., Atkins, M., Pointer, C. and Wilding, C.R., CEC Report F1 1W0025UK(H), Jan.-June 1988.Google Scholar
20. Macphee, D.E., Atkins, M. and Glasser, F.P., in ‘Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XII’, MRS Proc. 127, (1989).Google Scholar
21. Brown, P.W., 8th. Int. Conf. Chem. Cem., Vol.3, Theme 2, p.231–238, (1986).Google Scholar
22. Wagman, D.D., Evans, W.H., Parker, V.B., Schumm, R.H., Halow, I., Bailey, S.M. Bailey, K.L., Churney, K.L. and Nuttall, R.L., ‘The NBS Tables of Chemical Thermodynamic Proerties’, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, Vol.11, supp.no.2, (1982).Google Scholar
23. Bard, A.J., Parsons, R. and Jordan, J., ‘Standard Potentials in Aqueous Solution’, M.Decker (pub.), (1985).Google Scholar
24. Vovk, I.F., Radiochimica Acta 44/45, p.195–199, (1988).Google Scholar