Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T02:00:09.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electrochemical Studies of Corrosion of Sinfuel: Simulated Used UO2 Fuel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

S. Sunder ,
D.W. Shoesmith  and
N.H. Miller
S. Sunder
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, Manitoba, CanadaROE 1LO
D.W. Shoesmith
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, Manitoba, CanadaROE 1LO
N.H. Miller
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, Manitoba, CanadaROE 1LO
Get access

Abstract

The corrosion of SIMFUEL, simulated high-burnup CANDU (CANadian Deuterium Uranium) fuel, was investigated in 0.1 mol·dm−3 NaClO4 solution (pH ∼ 9.5) as a function of dissolved oxygen concentration using electrochemical techniques and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Electrodes were constructed of SIMFUEL pellets with compositions close to those of a natural UO2 fuel that has undergone burnup of 3 at% and 6 at%. The XPS analysis of freshly polished SIMFUEL pellets showed that the extent of uranium oxidation in SIMFUEL was equivalent to that in stoichiometric UO2. The SIMFUEL electrodes showed higher conductivity and electrochemical reactivity than the pure UO2 electrodes. A comparison of the open circuit corrosion potentials of the SIMFUEL electrodes with that of a pure UO2 electrode in oxygenated solutions showed a much faster increase in the potential for the SIMFUEL electrodes at short times. This suggests that the initial stages of UO2 oxidation, i.e., UO2 → UO2+x → UO2.33, are facilitated by fission product impurities in the UO2 matrix. However, the “steady-state” oxidation of uranium in SIMFUEL by the dissolved O2 was similar to that observed in pure UO2 under similar conditions.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 294: Symposium V – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVI , 1992 , 35
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Johnson, L.H. and Shoesmith, D.W., in Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future, edited by Lutze, W. and Ewing, R.C. (Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V. 1988), pp. 635–698.Google Scholar
2. Sunder, S., Shoesmith, D.W., Christensen, H., Miller, N.H. and Bailey, M.G., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIII, edited by Oversby, V.M. and Brown, P.W. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 176, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990) pp. 457–464.;Google Scholar
Grambow, B., Werme, L.O., Forsyth, R.S. and Bruno, J., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIII, edited by Oversby, V.M. and Brown, P.W. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 176, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990), pp 465–474; Stout, R.B., Shaw, H.F. and Einziger, R.E., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIII, edited by Oversby, V.M. and Brown, P.W. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 176, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990), pp. 475–488.;Google Scholar
Wilson, C.N. and Gray, W.J., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIII, edited by Oversby, V.M. and Brown, P.W. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 176, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990), pp. 489–498.Google Scholar
Bates, J.K., Tani, B.S., Veleckis, E. and Wronkiewicz, D.J., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIII, edited by Oversby, V.M. and Brown, P.W. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 176, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990), pp. 499–506.Google Scholar
3. Sunder, S., Shoesmith, D.W., Bailey, M.G., Stanchell, F.W. and McIntyre, N.S.,. J. Electroanal. Chem. 130, 163 (1981).Google Scholar
4. Sunder, S., Shoesmith, D.W., Bailey, M.G. and Wallace, G.J., in Canadian Nuclear Society International Conference on Radioactive Waste Management, Conference Proceedings, Winnipeg, MB, 1982, pp. 398–405.Google Scholar
5. Johnson, L.H., Shoesmith, D.W., Lunansky, G.E., Bailey, M.G. and Tremaine, P.R., Nucl. Technol. 56, 238 (1982).Google Scholar
6. Shoesmith, D.W., Sunder, S., Bailey, M.G. and Wallace, G.J., in Canadian Nuclear Society 2nd International Conference on Radioactive Waste Management, Conference Proceedings, Winnipeg, MB, 1986, pp. 674–679.Google Scholar
7. Shoesmith, D.W., Sunder, S., Bailey, M.G. and Wallace, G.J.,. Corros. Sci. 29, 1115 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Sunder, S. and Shoesmith, D.W.,. Chemistry of UO2 fuel dissolution in relation to the disposal of used nuclear fuel.Google Scholar
9. Shoesmith, D.W. and Sunder, S., An Electrochemistry-based model for the dissolution of UO2, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-10488. (1991). Also, SKB Technical Report 91-63.Google Scholar
10. Sunder, S., Shoesmith, D.W., Miller, N.H. and Wallace, G.J., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, XV. edited by Sombert, C.G., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 257, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992) pp. 345–352.Google Scholar
11. Shoesmith, D.W., S. Sunder and Hocking, W.H.,. 1992. Electrochemistry of UO2 Nuclear Fuel. Chapter XX in “Electrochemistry of Novel Materials”. VCH Publishers. Submitted for Publication.Google Scholar
12. Lucuta, P.G., Palmer, B.J.F., Matzke, H. and Hartwig, D.S., in Proceedings of Second International Conference on CANDU Fuel, edited by Hastings, I.J., (1989), pp. 132–146.Google Scholar
13. Lucuta, P.G., Verrall, R.A., Matzke, H. and Palmer, B.J.F., J. Nucl. Mater. 178, 48 (1991).Google Scholar
14. Matzke, H., Lucuta, P.G. and Verrall, R.A., J. Nucl. Mater. 185, 292 (1991).Google Scholar
15. Sandino, A., Casas, I., K. Ollila and Bruno, J., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIV, edited by Abrajano, T. Jr., and Johnson, L.H., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 212, Pittsburg, PA, 1991 pp. 221–228.Google Scholar
16. Casas, I., Sandino, A., Caceci, M.S., Bruno, J. and Ollila, K.. SIMFUEL Dissolution in Granitic Groundwater. SKB Technical Report 91-34 (1991).Google Scholar
17. Sunder, S., Boyer, G.D. and Miller, N.H., J. Nucl. Mater. 175, 163 (1990).Google Scholar
18. McIntyre, N.S., Sunder, S., Shoesmith, D.W. and Stanchell, F.W., J. Vac. Scd. Technol. 18, 714 (1981).Google Scholar
19. Wagner, C.D., Riggs, W.M., Davis, L.E., Moulder, J.F. and Muilenberg, G.E., Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Perkin-Elmer. Corporation Physical Electronics Division, Eden Prairie, MN. (1970).Google Scholar
20. Verbist, J., Riga, J., Pireaux, J.J. and Caudano, R., J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 5, 193 (1974).Google Scholar
21. Veal, B.W. Jr., and Lam, D.J., in GMELIN Handbook of Inorganic Chemistry, Uranium Supplement Volume A5, edited by Buschbeck, K. and Kellor, C. (Springer Verlag Publisher, Heidelberg, 1982) pp. 176–210.Google Scholar
22. Allan, G.C., Tempest, P.A. and Tyler, J.W., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. I., 83, 925 (1987); ibid., 84, 4049 (1988).Google Scholar
23. Sunder, S. and Miller, N.H., (unpublished work).Google Scholar
24. Cohen, I. and Berman, R.M., J. Nucl. Mater. 18, 77 (1966).Google Scholar
25. Hocking, W.H., Betteridge, J.S. and Shoesmith, D.W., J. Nucl. Mater. 190, 36 (1992).Google Scholar
26. Hocking, W.H., Betteridge, J.S. and Shoesmith, D.W.,. The cathodic reduction of dioxygen in dilute alkaline aqueous solutions. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-10402 (1992).Google Scholar