Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:51:08.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effects of Ion Beam Mixing on Rapid Thermal Annealed Ohmic Contacts to N-GaAs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Seemi Kazmi
Affiliation:
Centre for Electrophotonic Materials and Devices, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4M1.
Roman V. Kruzelecky
Affiliation:
Centre for Electrophotonic Materials and Devices, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4M1.
David A. Thompson
Affiliation:
Centre for Electrophotonic Materials and Devices, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4M1.
Get access

Abstract

Ni/Ge/Au and Ni/Ge/Pd contacts have been made on 1018 cm-3 n-type GaAs. The contacts were subjected to ion beam mixing through the metallization using 70-130 keV Se+ ions and subsequently subjected to rapid thermal annealing (RTA). These are compared with unimplanted contacts produced by RTA techniques on the same substrate. The specific contact resistance ,pc, has been measured for the two systems. In addition, the contacts have been studied using Auger depth profiling and SEM studies have been used to determine surface morphology. Values of pc ∽ 10-6 -10-7 ohm-cm2 have been measured. It is observed that ion beam mixing or the addition of a Ti overlayer (to the Ni/Ge/Au) improves the contact morphology.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Braslau, N., Gunn, J. B. and Staples, J. N., Sol.St.Electron. 10, 381 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Piotrowska, A., Guivarc’h, A. and Pelous, G., Sol.St.Electron. 26, 179 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Braslau, N., J.Vac. Sci. Technol.19, 803 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Yokoyama, N., Ohkawa, S. and Ishikawa, H., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 14 1071 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Ogawa, M.,J. Appl.Phys. 51 (1980) 406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Ito, H., Ishibashi, T. and Sugeta, T., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 23, L635 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Sinha, A.K., Smith, T. E. and Levinstein, H. J., IEEE Trans. El. Dev. ED–22. 218 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Grinolds, H.R. and Robinson, G. Y., Sol.St.Electron. 23, 973 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Barcz, A. J., Domansky, M., Jagielski, J. and Kaminska, E., Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. Phys. Res. B19/20. 773 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Jie, Z. and Thompson, D.A., J. Electronic Materials 17, 249 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Bhattacharya, R.S, Rai, A. K., Ezis, A., Rashid, M. and Pronko, P., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A3, 2316 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Yoder, M.N., Sol.St.Electron. 23, 117 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Berger, H.H., Sol.St.Electron. 15, 145 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Ziegler, J.F., Biersack, J.P. and Littmark, U., TRIM-89 code, IBM (1989).Google Scholar