Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T09:33:06.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Water on Mechanical Properties of Mineralized Tissue Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Amanpreet Kaur Bembey
Affiliation:
a.k.bembey@qmul.ac.uk, Queen Mary, University of London, Department of Materials, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, United Kingdom
Michelle L Oyen
Affiliation:
mlo29@cam.ac.uk, Queen Mary, University of London, Department of Materials, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, United Kingdom
Virginia L. Ferguson
Affiliation:
Virginia.Ferguson@colorado.edu, University of Colorado, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Boulder, CO, 80309, United States
Andrew J. Bushby
Affiliation:
a.j.bushby@qmul.ac.uk, Queen Mary, University of London, Department of Materials, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, United Kingdom
Alan Boyde
Affiliation:
a.boyde@qmul.ac.uk, Queen Mary, University of London, Oral Growth and Development, London, E1 1BB, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

In the current study, the effects of polar solvents on tissue volume and mechanical properties are considered. Area shrinkage measurements are conducted for mineralized, bone tissue samples soaked in polar solvents. Area shrinkage is used to calculate approximate linear and volume shrinkage. Results are compared with viscoelastic mechanical parameters for bone in the same solvents (as measured previously) and with both shrinkage measurements and mechanical data for nonmineralized tissues, as taken from the existing literature. As expected, the shrinkage of mineralized tissues is minimal when compared with shrinkage of nonmineralized tissues immersed in the same polar solvents. The mechanical changes in bone are also substantially less than in nonmineralized tissues. The largest stiffness values are found in shrunken bone samples (immersed in acetone and ethanol). The mineral phase in bone thus resists tissue shrinkage that would otherwise occur in the pure soft tissue phase.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bembey, A K, Bushby, A J, Boyde, A, Ferguson, V L, and Oyen, M L, J. Mater. Res., 21(8):1962 (2006)Google Scholar
2. Bembey, A K, Oyen, M L, Bushby, A J, and Boyde, A, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 898E, 0898–L07 (2006)Google Scholar
3. Bembey, A K, Oyen, M L, Bushby, A J, and Boyde, A, Phil. Mag., 86:5691 (2006)Google Scholar
4. Sasaki, N, Nakayama, Y, Yoshikawa, M, and Enyo, A, J. Biomech.26:1369 (1993)Google Scholar
5. Oyen, M L, J. Mater. Res. 20:2094 (2005)Google Scholar
6. Lee, E H and Radok, J R M, J. Appl. Mech. 27:438 (1960)Google Scholar
7. Johnson, K L, Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1985)Google Scholar
8. Mattice, J M, Lau, A G, Oyen, M L, and Kent, R W, J. Mater. Res. 21:2003–10 (2006)Google Scholar
9. Bushby, A J, Ferguson, V L, and Boyde, A, J. Mater. Res., 19(1):249 (2004)Google Scholar
10. Boyde, A and Maconnachie, E, Scanning, 2:149 (1979)Google Scholar
11. Ntim, M, Bembey, A K, Ferguson, V L, and Bushby, A J, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 898E, 0898–L05 (2006)Google Scholar
12. Tooze, J J. Cell Biol. 22:551 (1964)Google Scholar
13. Cowin, S C, J. Biomech. 32:217 (1999)Google Scholar