Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:02:51.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Polysilicon Deposition and Doping Processes on Double-Poly Capacitors - Electrical and AFM Evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

W. M. Paulson
Affiliation:
Motorola, 3501 Ed Bluestein Boulevard, Austin, TX 78721
L. H. Breaux
Affiliation:
Motorola, 3501 Ed Bluestein Boulevard, Austin, TX 78721
R. I. Hegde
Affiliation:
Motorola, 3501 Ed Bluestein Boulevard, Austin, TX 78721
P. J. Tobin
Affiliation:
Motorola, 3501 Ed Bluestein Boulevard, Austin, TX 78721
Get access

Abstract

We have characterized the surface topography of silicon films from different deposition and doping process sequences using AFM and optical reflectivity. The resulting surface structures after deposition, doping, oxide growth, and oxide removal correlate with the electrical leakage currents and breakdown voltages of double polysilicon capacitors. As-deposited amorphous films had smoother surfaces than those deposited in the crystalline state. Gas-phase diffusion doping increases the surface roughness. Only the amorphous in situ doped films retained a smooth surface following oxidation, yielding low leakage capacitors with breakdown fields above 8 MV/cm. Surprisingly, implanted amorphous films exhibited the roughest interfaces, resulting in lower breakdown fields. This study has shown that AFM provides an effective, quick, non-destructive diagnostic technique for semiconductor processing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Queirlol, G., Brambilla, M. and Mavero, C., MRS Symp Proc. 182, 269 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Hendriks, M. and Mavero, C., J. Electrochemical Soc., 136, 1446–74 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Mori, S. et al. , Proc. IEEE IRPS, p132 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Sarid, D. and Elings, V., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B9(2), 431 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Wickramasinghe, H. K., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A8(1), 363 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Lee, J. C. and Hu, C., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices ED–35, 1063 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Faraone, L. and Harbeke, G., J. ECS 133, 1410 (1986).Google Scholar