Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-23T10:39:27.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Ion-Bombardment on the Formation of Voids During Deposition of a-Ge:H

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

F. Origo
Affiliation:
DFA-IFGW- Universidade Estadual de Campinas – UNICAMP Campinas 13083-970 SP, Brazil
P. Hammer
Affiliation:
DFA-IFGW- Universidade Estadual de Campinas – UNICAMP Campinas 13083-970 SP, Brazil
D. Comedi
Affiliation:
DFA-IFGW- Universidade Estadual de Campinas – UNICAMP Campinas 13083-970 SP, Brazil, comedi@ifi.unicamp.br
I. Chambouleyron
Affiliation:
DFA-IFGW- Universidade Estadual de Campinas – UNICAMP Campinas 13083-970 SP, Brazil
Get access

Abstract

The role of substrate ion bombardment on the structural and H bonding properties of hydrogenated amorphous germanium (a-Ge:H) films was studied by infrared (ir) spectroscopy. A Kaufman type ion source was used to produce an Ar1 beam directed towards a Ge target for a- Ge:H ion beam sputtering deposition in a H2-containing vacuum chamber. A low energy (100 eV) H2++Ar+ beam obtained from an additional ion source was allowed to impinge directly on the substrate during film growth at various beam currents.

It was found that substrate bombardment by 100 eV ions favors the formation of voids, as deduced from the increasing contribution of the surface-like Ge-H stretching mode to the ir spectrum with increasing ion current. The void density was reduced below the ir detection limit by totally removing the ion beam on the substrate while keeping all other parameters fixed. For this condition, we observe no or very small surface-like contributions to the ir spectra, irrespective of substrate temperature (25-260°C) or growth rate used. A narrowing of the infrared Ge-H stretching mode peak is observed with increasing deposition temperature, indicating a concomitant tendency towards a more ordered structure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Marques, F.C. and Chambouleyron, I., Proc. 9th EC Solar Energy Conf. Ed. Palz, W., Wrixon, G.T., Helm, P., Kluwer, Dordrecht 1989 (p. 1042).Google Scholar
2 Karg, F.H., Böhm, H., Pierz, K., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 114, 477 (1989).Google Scholar
3 Turner, W.A., Jones, S.J., Pang, D., Bateman, B.E., Chen, J.H., Li, Y.M., Marques, F.C., Wetsel, A.E., Wickboldt, P., Paul, W., Bodart, J., Norberg, R.E., Elzawawi, I., Theye, M.L., J. Appl. Phys. 67, 7430 (1990).Google Scholar
4 Driisedau, T. and Schröder, B., J. Appl. Phys. 75, 2864 (1994).Google Scholar
5 Paul, W., Street, R.A., Wagner, S., J. Electr. Mat. 22, 39 (1993).Google Scholar
6 Fang, C.J., Gruntz, K.J., Ley, L., Cardona, M., Demond, F.J., Muller, G., Kabiltzer, S., J. Non- Cryst. Solids 35/36, 255 (1980).Google Scholar
7 Mulato, M., Torriani, I.L., Chambouleyron, I., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 164–166, 155 (1993).Google Scholar
8 Smidt, F.A., Int. Mat. Rev. 35, 61 (1990).Google Scholar
9 Yehoda, J.E., Yang, B., Vedam, K., Messier, R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 6, 1631 (1988).Google Scholar
10 Biersack, J.P., Haggmark, L.G., Nucl. Instrum. Methods 174, 257 (1980).Google Scholar
11 Bhan, M. K., Malhotra, L.K., Kashyap, S.C., J. Appl. Phys. 65, 241 (1989).Google Scholar