Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T02:27:58.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Ga Content on the Recombination Behavior of Grain Boundaries in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Solar Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2014

Harvey Guthrey
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401, U.S.A.
Miguel Contreras
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401, U.S.A.
Mowafak Al-Jassim
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

The highest efficiency CuIn1-xGaxSe2 (CIGS) based solar cells have been produced from films with x∼0.3 which gives a value of Eg around 1.1-1.2eV. Increasing the Ga content of the CIGS absorber provides an increase in Voc, allows tuning of the band gap that can enhance performance under actual operating conditions, and potentially makes it possible to use CIGS films in multi-junction devices. However, champion cells have not yet been produced for values of x significantly greater than 0.3. This work focuses on how increased Ga content in CIGS films affects the recombination behavior of grain boundaries. Cathodoluminescence spectral imaging (CLSI) measurements on fully processed devices allow us to compare device properties with recombination behavior and optical properties of grain boundaries in films with different Ga content. Our data suggests that grain boundaries in high efficiency films with x∼0.3 exhibit a significant red shift in the CL spectra whereas grain boundaries in films with higher Ga content typically show either a small shift or none at all. This shift indicates band bending near the boundaries which could enhance charge separation and subsequent collection of carriers generated near grain boundaries. This is investigated statistically to identify trends in different regions of the films.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Hanna, G., et al. ., Texture and electronic activity of grain boundaries in Cu (In, Ga) Se2 thin films. Applied Physics A, 2006. 82(1): p. 17.10.1007/s00339-005-3411-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, C. and Zunger, A., Anomalous Grain Boundary Physics in Polycrystalline CuInSe2 : The Existence of a Hole Barrier. Physical review letters, 2003. 91(26): p. 266401.10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.266401CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Persson, C. and Zunger, A., Compositionally induced valence-band offset at the grain boundary of polycrystalline chalcopyrites creates a hole barrier. Applied Physics Letters, 2005. 87(21): p. 211904–211904-3.10.1063/1.2132537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetzer, M., et al. ., On microscopic compositional and electrostatic properties of grain boundaries in polycrystalline Cu In1-x Ga x Se2 . Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures, 2006. 24(4): p. 17391745.10.1116/1.2209995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetzer, M., et al. ., Direct observation of copper depletion and potential changes at copper indium gallium diselenide grain boundaries. Applied Physics Letters, 2005. 86(16): p. 162105–162105-3.10.1063/1.1906331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichterwitz, M., et al. ., Influence of grain boundaries on current collection in Cu (In, Ga) Se2 thin-film solar cells. Thin Solid Films, 2009. 517(7): p. 25542557.10.1016/j.tsf.2008.11.064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, C.-S., et al. ., Does the local built-in potential on grain boundaries of Cu (In, Ga) Se thin films benefit photovoltaic performance of the device? Applied physics letters, 2004. 85: p. 2625.10.1063/1.1793346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, C.S., et al. ., How grain boundaries in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin films are charged: Revisit. Applied Physics Letters, 2012. 101(3): p. 033903–4.10.1063/1.4737406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bothe, K., Bauer, G., and Unold, T., Spatially resolved photoluminescence measurements on Cu (In, Ga) Se2 thin films. Thin Solid Films, 2002. 403: p. 453456.10.1016/S0040-6090(01)01541-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, G., et al. ., Influence of the Ga-content on the bulk defect densities of Cu(In,Ga)Se2. Thin Solid Films, 2001. 387(1–2): p. 7173.10.1016/S0040-6090(00)01710-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, S.-H., Zhang, S.B., and Zunger, A., Effects of Ga addition to CuInSe2 on its electronic, structural, and defect properties. Applied Physics Letters, 1998. 72(24): p. 31993201.10.1063/1.121548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenbarth, T., et al. ., Origin of defects in CuIn 1− x Ga x Se 2 solar cells with varied Ga content. Thin Solid Films, 2009. 517(7): p. 22442247.10.1016/j.tsf.2008.10.142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gloeckler, M., Sites, J.R., and Metzger, W.K., Grain-boundary recombination inCuInGaSe2 solar cells. Journal of applied physics, 2005. 98(11): p. 113704–113704-10.10.1063/1.2133906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romero, M.J., et al. ., Comparative study of the luminescence and intrinsic point defects in the kesterite Cu2ZnSn4 and chalcopyrite Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin films used in photovoltaic applications. Physical Review B, 2011. 84(16): p. 165324.10.1103/PhysRevB.84.165324CrossRefGoogle Scholar