Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T04:52:51.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of a Thin Sample on the Extended Defect Evolution in Si+ Implanted Si

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Jing-Hong Li
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, 525 Engineering Building University of Florida, P. O. Box 116130, Gainesville, FL 32611–6130
Kevin S. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, 525 Engineering Building University of Florida, P. O. Box 116130, Gainesville, FL 32611–6130
Get access

Abstract

The annealing kinetics of implant damage in Si+ implanted Si has been investigated using in-situ and ex-situ annealing of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) samples prepared prior to annealing. The defect evolution at 800°C was studied for a Si wafer implanted with Si+ at 100keV to a dose of 2×1014 cm-2. This implant was above the sub-threshold loop formation threshold allowing one to study simultaneously the {311} defect dissolution and dislocation loop nucleation and growth. In order to study the effect on the defect evolution of using a thin sample for an in-situ annealing experiment, a pair of samples, one thick and one thinned into a TEM sample, were annealed in a furnace simultaneously. It was found that the presence of a second surface 2000Å below the implant damage did not affect the extended defect evolution. For the in-situ annealing study it was found that the {311} dissolution process and sub-threshold dislocation loop formation process was not affected by the TEM electron beam at 160kV as long as an 800°C furnace pre-anneal was done prior to in-situ annealing. The dissolution rate of the {311} defects was used to confirm the TEM holder furnace temperature. The results of both the in-situ the {311} defects is released during the 311 dissolution process and 30% comes to reside in dislocation loops. Thus, the loops appear to contain a significant fraction of the total interstitial concentration introduced by the implant.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Jones, K. S., Prussin, S. and Weber, E. R., Appl. Phys. A 45, 1, 1988.Google Scholar
2. Eaglesham, D. J., Stolk, P. A., Gossmann, H.-J. and Poate, J. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 2305 (1994)Google Scholar
3. Stolk, P. A., Gossmann, H. -J., Eaglesham, D. J., Jacobson, D. C., Rafferty, C. J., Gilmer, G. H., Jaraiz, M., Poate, J. M., Luftman, H. S. and Haynes, T. E., J. Appl. Phys. 81, 6031 (1997)Google Scholar
4. Schretelkamp, R. J., Custer, J. S., Liefting, J. R., Lu, W. X. and Saris, F. W., Mat. Sci. Rep., 6, 275 (1991)Google Scholar
5. Jones, K. S., Liu, J., Zhang, L., Krishnamoorthy, V., Dehoff, R. T., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res. B, 106, 227, (1995)Google Scholar
6. Stolk, P. A., Gossmann, H-J., Eaglesham, D. J., Jacobson, D. C., Luftman, H. S. and Poate, J. M., MRS Sym. Proc, Vol. 354 (1995)Google Scholar
7. Li, J. H. and Jones, K. S., unpublishedGoogle Scholar