Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T03:40:50.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dispersion and Lorentz Microscopy of Samarium Cobalt Nanoparticles in a Polymer Matrix

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Yan Jin
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213
Sara A. Majetich
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213
Anit Giri
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213
Get access

Abstract

A new method for dispersing magnetic nanoparticles in a polymer matrix is described. SmCo5 nanoparticle powders are first prepared by ball milling, and then embedded in thermoplastic powder by further milling. The nanoparticle-embedded thermoplastic powder was compacted to form solid magnetic composites which were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and by SQUID magnetometry. The conventional TEM measurements on microtomed sections of the composites showed spherical nanoparticles clearly separated from their nearest neighbors, thereby eliminating exchange interactions and greatly reducing magnetostatic interactions. Lorentz microscopy illustrated the potential for imaging single particles and determining the magnetization directions of isolated and interacting particles. Magnetic measurements on dilute samples show that the processing method does not degrade the magnetic properties of the particles.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Herzer, G., J. Magn. Magn. Mater 112, p. 258 (1992); G. Herzer, IEEE Trans. Magn. 26, p. 1397 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Cullity, B. D., Introduction to Magnetic Materials, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 1972, p. 190.Google Scholar
3. Berkowitz, A., Young, A. P., Mitchell, J. R., Zhang, S., Carey, M. J., Spada, F. E., Parker, F. T., Hutten, A., and Thomas, G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, p. 3745 (1992); J. Q. Xiao, J. S. Jiang, and C. L. Chien, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, p. 3749 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Luborsky, F. E., J. Appl. Phys. 32, p.171S (1961).Google Scholar
5. Kirkpatrick, E. M., Majetich, S. A., and McHenry, M. E., IEEE Trans. Mag. 32, p. 4502 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Schalek, R. L., Leslie-Pelecky, D. L., Knight, J., Sellmyer, D. J., and Axtell, S. C., IEEE Trans. Mag. 31, p. 3772 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Reimer, L., Transmission Electron Microscopy. Physics of Image Formation and Microanalysis, Springer-Verlag, NY, 1984.Google Scholar
8. Conley, R. and Lloyd, M., Clays and Clay Min. 18, p. 37 (1970).Google Scholar
9. Salling, C., Schultz, S., McFayden, I., and Ozaki, M., IEEE Trans. Mag. 27, p. 5184 (1993).Google Scholar
10. Kirkpatrick, E. M., Ph. D. thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 1997.Google Scholar
11. Majetich, S. A., Scott, J. H., Kirkpatrick, E. M., Chowdary, K., Gallagher, K., and McHenry, M. E., Nanostructured Materials, 9, p. 291 (1997).Google Scholar