Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:40:35.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dielectric Properties of Glass Capillary Arrays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

T. E. Huber
Affiliation:
Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, N.Y. 11201. Howard University, Washington, D.C. 20059.
Leo Silber
Affiliation:
Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, N.Y. 11201.
Frank Boccuzzi
Affiliation:
Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, N.Y. 11201.
Get access

Abstract

Glass Capillary Arrays (GCA) are low density columnar monolithic structures made of soda-lime glass. This structure, in which 76% of volume between the columns, the channels, is void, also has a greatly reduced dielectric constant in comparison with bulk glass. We have measured the index of refraction and absorption of samples of GCA's in the X-band, 8 × 109 Hz to 1.2×1010 Hz, for various orientations of the channels with respect to the polarization. For channels perpendicular to the polarization direction we have measured an index of refraction of 1.15. In comparison the index of refraction of (bulk) soda-lime glass is 2.6. We also examined the absorption in the far-infrared (FIR) frequency range between 6×1011 Hz and 6×1012 Hz. In this frequency range we obtain a k2 dependence due to losses in the glass matrix at higher frequencies. The results of the X-band and FIR results are interpreted in terms of an effective medium theory of the real and imaginary part of the dielectric constant of the composite.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Landauer, R., “Electrical Conductivity in Inhomogeneous Media” in “Electrical Transport and Optical Properties of Inhomogeneous Media” edited by Garland, J. C. and Tanner, D. B. (ALP, New York, 1978).Google Scholar
2. Smythe, W. R. in “Static and Dynamic Electricity” (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1950), p 67.Google Scholar
3. Cohen, R. W., Cody, G. D., Coutts, M. D., and Abeles, B., Phys. Rev. B8, 3689 (1973).Google Scholar
4. For a discussion on interparticle effects, see L.K.H. van Beek in Progress in Dielectrics, Vol.7, edited by Birks, J. B. (CRC Press, Cleveland, Ohio, 1967). Also, more recently, N.A. Nicorovici and R.C. McPhedran, Phys. Rev. E 54, 1945 (1996).Google Scholar
5. Bohren, C. F. and Hoffman, D. R., “Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles”, (J. Wiley, New York, 1983, p. 38).Google Scholar
6. Galileo Electro-Optics Corp., Galileo Park, Sturbridge, MA.Google Scholar
7. Huber, T. E. and Luo, L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 70 2502 (1997).Google Scholar
8. Bomem, Hartmann, and Braun, , Quebec, , Canada.Google Scholar
9. Bagdade, W. and Stolen, R., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 29 2001 (1968).Google Scholar
10. Altshuler, H. in “Handbook of Microwave Measurements” 3th ed, Edited by Sucher, M. and Fox, J. (Interscience, New York, 1963), pp. 533.Google Scholar