Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T11:30:07.452Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development and Validation of a Model of Uranium Release to Groundwater From Legacy Disposals at the UK Low Level Waste Repository

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

J.S. Small
Affiliation:
Nexia Solutions Ltd, Warrington, UK
C. Lennon
Affiliation:
Nexia Solutions Ltd, Warrington, UK
S. Kwong
Affiliation:
Nexia Solutions Ltd, Warrington, UK
R.J. Scott
Affiliation:
LLWR, Holmrook, Cumbria, UK
Get access

Abstract

A previous radiological assessment of the UK Low Level Waste Repository (LLWR) has considered how the prevailing reducing chemical conditions in disposal trenches, may limit uranium release through the extreme low solubility of U(IV) solids. This study considers the additional effects that the physical and chemical nature of the uranium wastes may have on the release of uranium. Fluoride process residues produced by refining of uranium metal comprise the majority of the legacy inventory. Based on historic records and descriptions of the uranium wastes a conceptual model has been developed which bounds the release rate of uranium present as inclusions and dissolved in the solid residues by the dissolution rate of a magnesium fluoride matrix. The model is represented in a 3-dimensional groundwater flow and geochemical model. Initial findings indicate that the model correctly represents the range of fluoride and uranium concentrations that are measured in leachate from the LLWR trenches. Incorporation of this model in future safety assessments, together with a reduction in the derived inventory of uranium, is likely to result in a significant lowering of the peak groundwater dose to acceptable levels, even in the case that the site re-oxidizes. The study builds confidence in the inherent safety features that are provided by the sparingly soluble uranium waste residues and the reducing chemical conditions of the LLWR trenches.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 BNFL. Drigg Post-Closure Safety Case: Overview Report. (2002).Google Scholar
2 Small, J.S., Abraitis, P.K., , Beadle, Johnstone, I.R., Kelly, P. Pettit, C.L. and Stevens, G.A. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXVII. Edited by Oversby, V.M. and Werme, L.O., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 807, Kalmar, Sweden, 2004), pp905910.Google Scholar
3 Page, H. United Kingdom experience of uranium tetrafluoride production. Uranium'82. 12th Annual hydrometallurgical meeting, Toronto Ontario, Canada Aug. 29- Sept, 1, 1982.Google Scholar
4 Chaudhury, S. Singh Mudher, K.D. and Venugopal, V. Journal of Nuclear Materials 322, p 119125 (2003).Google Scholar
5 Avvaru, B., Roy, S.B., Chowdhury, S., Hareendran, K.N. and Pandit, A.B. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45, p76397648 (2006).Google Scholar
6 Zhang, R., Hu, A. and Zhang, X. Aquatic Geochemistry, 12, p 123159 (2006).Google Scholar
7 Parkhurst, D.L. and Appelo, C.A.J.User's Guide to PHREEQC (Version 2) – A Computer Program for Speciation, Batch-Reaction, One-Dimensional Transport and Inverse Geochemical Calculations.” U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Investigations Report 99-4259. (1999).Google Scholar
8 Parkhurst, D.L., Kipp, K. L., Engesgaard, P., and Charlton, S. R.PHAST-A Program for Simulating Ground-Water Flow, Solute Transport, and multicomponent Geochemical Reactions”, U.S. Geological Survey, Techniques and Methods 6-A8, 154 p.(2004).Google Scholar