Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T20:36:23.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development and Application of Electroluminescence Imaging for CdS/CdTe Characterization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Scott Feldman ,
Fred Seymour ,
Tim Ohno ,
Victor Kaydanov  and
Reuben Collins
Scott Feldman
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Colorado School of Mines Golden, CO 80401
Fred Seymour
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Colorado School of Mines Golden, CO 80401
Tim Ohno
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Colorado School of Mines Golden, CO 80401
Victor Kaydanov
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Colorado School of Mines Golden, CO 80401
Reuben Collins
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Colorado School of Mines Golden, CO 80401
Get access

Abstract

A technique for spatially resolved optical characterization of CdS/CdTe thin film solar cells has been developed using electroluminescence (EL). In EL, excess minority carriers are injected via forward biasing. Light produced in radiative carrier recombination is collected with a CCD camera. Because EL intensity depends upon radiative vs. non-radiative recombination lifetimes, EL provides insight into material quality.

Spatial resolution is a key benefit of EL as it provides insight into the non-uniformities of polycrystalline CdTe. At high magnification the resolution is diffraction limited, but coarser measurements of up to several millimeters in range may also be made. Non-uniformities in emission have been observed throughout this range.

Further benefits of EL as a characterization technique are as follows: EL probes the region of most interest, namely the CdTe near the main junction. Also, it is observable at room temperature and data acquisition is fast. Finally, EL is observable at very low carrier injection rates, comparable to short circuit current. (Though more structure is often revealed at higher injection rates.) This low injection means that EL can be a non-destructive probe. This fact, along with the aforementioned ease of observation, means that EL could possibly be used for quality control and in situ testing of modules.

Data gathered from CdS/CdTe cells from various institutions deposited using different methods such as close spaced sublimation, vapor transport, and sputtering are presented. In addition to changes in deposition technique, changes in processing parameters were observed to affect EL emission. Furthermore, overall EL emission decreased noticeably with stress at various biases and elevated temperature, with non-uniformity increasing in many cases. Changes in EL become apparent before changes in parameters acquired with standard current-voltage measurements, suggesting that this technique can be used as an early indicator for degrading cells. Finally, some dramatic changes in EL with stress suggest highly non-uniform degradation of the back contact.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 763: Symposium B – Compound Semiconductor Photovoltaics , 2003 , B5.10
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Romero, M.J., Albin, D. S., M.M.Al-Jassim, Wu, X., Moutinho, H.R., and Dhere, R. G., Appl. Phys. Letters, 81, 2962 (2002)Google Scholar
2. Galloway, S. A., Edwards, P. R. and Durose, K., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser., 157, 579 (1997)Google Scholar
3. Harju, R., Karpov, V. G., Grecu, D., and Dorer, G., J. Appl. Phys., 88, 1794 (2000)Google Scholar
4. Hiltner, J., Investigation of Spatial Variations in Collection Efficiency of Solar Cells. (Ph.D. thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO), 2001.Google Scholar
5. Herndon, M. K., Gupta, A., Kaydanov, V., and Collins, R. T., App. Phys. Letters, 75, 3503 (1999)Google Scholar
6. Shvydka, D., Compaan, A. D., and Karpov, V. G., J. Appl. Phys., 91, 9059 (2002)Google Scholar
7. Feldman, S., Townsend, S., Collins, R.T., Kaydanov, V., and Ohno, T.R.. “Electroluminescence and Photoluminescence of Stressed and Unstressed CdTe/CdS Cells,” Proceedings of the NCPV Program Review Meeting, September, 2001, Lakewood, CO.Google Scholar
8. Li, W., Ritala, M., Leskela, M., Niinisto, L., Spoinen, E., Sun, S., Tong, W., and Summers, C. J.. ‘Photo- and electroluminescence of SrS:Cu and SrS:Ag, Cu, Ga thin films,’ J. Appl. Phys, 86 (1999), pp. 5017–5025.Google Scholar
9. Song, H., Bao, X., Li, N., and Zhang, J., J. Appl. Phys., 82, 4028 (1997), pp.-4032.Google Scholar
10. Artemyev, M.V., Sperling, V., and Woggon, U., Appl. Phys., 81, 6975 (1997)Google Scholar
11. Rowell, N. L., Noel, J.-P., Houghton, S. C., and Buchanan, M., App. Phys. Letters, 58, 957 (1991)Google Scholar
12. Gilmore, A. S., Kaydanov, V., Ohno, T. R., Rose, D., Feldman, S.D., and Erslev, P., Proceedings of the 29th IEEE PV Specialists Conference, May, 2002, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
13. Compaan, A.D., Shvydka, D., K.J Price, Vasko, A., and Karpov, V.G., Proceedings of the NCPV Program Review Meeting, September, 2001, Lakewood, CO.Google Scholar
14. Tang, J, Mao, D., Ohno, T.R., Kaydanov, V., and Trefney, J.U., Proceedings of the 26th IEEE PV Specialists Conference, October, 1997, Anaheim, CA.Google Scholar
15. David, M.. Geostatistical Ore Reserve Estimation (Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam) 1977, pp. 73–90.Google Scholar
16. Jordan, A.S. and Ralston, J.M., J. Appl. Phys., 47, 4518 (1976)Google Scholar