Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T14:00:22.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Defect Reduction in Semiconductor Manufacturing a Case Study of BPO4 Elimination in BPSG Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Jim Wilson
Affiliation:
Motorola Inc., 6501 William Cannon Drive West, Austin, TX 78735
Tony Stephens
Affiliation:
Motorola Inc., 3501 Ed Bluestein. Austin, TX 78762
Get access

Abstract

This paper explains the analysis and elimination of BPO4 crystal formation in an Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Vapor Deposition BPSG film. Film deposition and furnace anneal/flow parameters were studied using full factorial techniques, with anneal/flow parameters having the most significant effect. It was learned that BPO4 crystals could be readily induced by performing the anneal/flow process in a POCl3/O2 ambient. Most testing was done in a POCl3/O2 ambient and inferences made concerning the standard anneal ambient.

BPO4 formation is primarily dependent on thermal processing during anneal toprovide the activation energy necessary to initiate crystal growth. Other factors include 02:Hydride ratio during film deposition, phosphorous concentration in the deposited film, deposition temperature, and anneal/flow ambient. No tested level of these secondary factors completely eliminated crystal formation.

The growth of BPO4 crystals can be eliminated by controlling the thermal environment ofthe anneal/flow step. The primary means employed was to increase the rate of heat dissipation by doubling the spacing between wafers. An alternative method involves utilization of reduced anneal/flow furnace temperatures.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Kern, W. & Smelter, R., Solid State Technology, 28, 171 (1985).Google Scholar
[2] Kern, W. & Schnable, G., RCA Review, 43, 423 (1982).Google Scholar
[3] Levy, R. & Nassau, K., Electrochem. Soc. Proa, “Reduced Temperature Processing for VLSI,” 86–5, 132.Google Scholar
[4] Kern, W., U.S. Patent #4,546,016 (October, 1985).Google Scholar
[5] Sharp, A., Patel, J., Vacuum, 35–10/11, 441 (1985).Google Scholar
[6] Kern, W., Kurylo, W. & Tino, C., RCA Review, 46, 117 (1985).Google Scholar
[7] Dornfest, C., Eur. Patent App. #86301742.2 (November, 1986).Google Scholar
[8] Grabiec, P. & Pietruszko, S., European Conference on Chemical Vapour Deposition, C5585 (1989).Google Scholar
[9] Becker, F., Pawlik, D., Schafer, H. & Staudigl, G., Journal of Vacuum Science Technology, B4–3, 732 (1986).Google Scholar
[10] Nakua, K. & Liu, C., Journal of Electrochemical Society, 138–8, 2367 (1991).Google Scholar
[11] Wakamatsu, H., U. S. Patent #4,879,253 (November, 1989).Google Scholar
[12] Susa, M., Hiroshima, Y., Senda, K. & Takamura, T.. Journal of Electrochemical Society, 133–7, 1517.Google Scholar
[13] Schnable, G., Fisher, A. & Shaw, J., Journal of Electrochemical Society, 137–12, 3973 (1990).Google Scholar
[14] Ciosek, W., Franka, J., Kobayashi, T., Lloyd, S., Ostrout, W., Walczyk, F., “A 6-Sigma Cross Organizational Process Optimization Task Force Using Taguchi Methodology to Achieve I.C. Planarization”, Motorola Defect Reduction Seminar (1989).Google Scholar
[15] Morris, D., “WJ Flowers Hunt”, Motorola internal report (1991).Google Scholar
[16] Kern, W. & Smelter, R., “WJ Flowers Hunt”, Motorola internal report, 174.Google Scholar
[17] Kern, W., Kurylo, W. & Tino, C., “WJ Flowers Hunt”, Motorola internal report, 123.Google Scholar
[18] Wilson, J., “BPSG Defect Reduction”, Motorola internal report (1990).Google Scholar
[19] Wakamatsu, H., “BPSG Defect Reduction”, Motorola internal report (1990).Google Scholar