Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:44:23.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Culture of Mammalian Cells on Single Crystal SiC Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Camilla Coletti
Affiliation:
camilla@eng.usf.edu, University of South Florida, Electrical Engineering, 4202 E. Fowler Ave., Tampa, FL, 33620, United States
Mark J. Jaroszeski
Affiliation:
mjarosze@eng.usf.edu, University of South Florida, Chemical Engineering, 4202 E. Fowler Ave., Tampa, FL, 33620, United States
Andrew M. Hoff
Affiliation:
hoff@eng.usf.edu, University of South Florida, Electrical Engineering, 4202 E. Fowler Ave., Tampa, FL, 33620, United States
Stephen E. Saddow
Affiliation:
saddow@eng.usf.edu, University of South Florida, Electrical Engineering, 4202 E. Fowler Ave., Tampa, FL, 33620, United States
Get access

Abstract

Crystalline silicon carbide (SiC) has the potential to become an important biomaterial and a versatile interface between the electronic and biological world. In this work, single crystal SiC biocompatibility is investigated by culturing mammalian cells directly on SiC substrates. The cell morphology and the quality of the cell adhesion have been studied using fluorescence microscopy, while MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] assays have been performed to quantify cell viability and number. Standard culture-wells and silicon (Si) substrates were used as controls in the final assessment of crystalline SiC biocompatibility.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Santavirta, S., Takagi, M., Nordsletten, L., Anttila, A., Lappalainen, R., Konttinen, Y.T., Biocompatibility of silicon carbide in colony formation test in vitro, Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg., 118, (1998), 8991.Google Scholar
2. Naji, A. and Harmand, M., Cytocompatibility of two coating materials, amorphous alumina and silicon carbide, using human differentiated cell cultures, Biomaterials, 12, (1991), 690694.Google Scholar
3. Kalnins, U., Erglis, A., Dinne, I., Kumsars, I., Jegere, S., Clinical outcomes of silicon carbide coated stents in patient with coronary disease, Med. Sci. Monit., 8, (2), 2002, PI16-20.Google Scholar
4. Kotzar, G., Freas, M., et al., Evaluation of MEMS materials of construction for implantable medical devices, Biomaterials, 23, (2002), 27372750.Google Scholar
5. Bayliss, S.C., Buckberry, L.D., Harris, P.J., Tobin, M., Nature of the Silicon-Animal Cell Interface, Journal of Porous Material, 7, 191195, (2000).Google Scholar
6. Angelescu, A., Kleps, I., Mihaela, M., Simion, M., Neghina, T., Petrescu, S., Moldovan, N., Paduraru, C. and Raducanu, A., Porus Silicon Matrix for Application in Biology, Rev. Adv. Mat. Sci., 5, (2003), 440449.Google Scholar
7. Bayliss, S.C., Heald, R., Fletcher, D.I. and Buckberry, L.D., The Culture of Mammalian Cells on Nanostructured Silicon, Adv. Mater., 11, No. 4, (1999), 318321.Google Scholar
8. http://www.corning.com/lifesciences/products__services/surfaces/cellculture/Google Scholar
9. Coletti, C., Hetzel, M., Virojanadara, C., Starke, U., and Saddow, S. E., “Surface morphology and structure of hydrogen etched 3C-SiC(001) on Si(001),” Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 911 (2006), 131136.Google Scholar
10. Sagvolden, G., Giaever, I., Pettersen, E.O. and Feder, J., Cell adhesion force microscopy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol.96, pp. 471476, January 1999.Google Scholar