Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-22T10:27:35.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Correlation between Quantitative Surface Metallic Contamination and RTP-Induced Surface Defects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

R. S. Hockett*
Affiliation:
Charles Evans & Associates, 301 Chesapeake Drive, Redwood City, CA 94063
Get access

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that surface metals, introduced by scraping metals either on the silicon wafer front or back surface, can contribute to surface crystalline defects during rapid thermal processing (RTP). These studies have been qualitative in the sense that the quantitative amount of surface metallic contamination was unknown. The work involved here uses Total reflection X-Ray Fluorescence (TXRF) analysis to quantitate the surface metallic contamination on silicon wafers from cleaning (rather than scraping) both before and after RTP. In this study there was no correlation found between surface copper (ranging from 2 to 200 ×1012 atoms/cm2) and surface defects after a RTP of 600°C for 30 seconds in argon, nor was there a correlation between temperature (ranging from 600°C to 1150°C) of the RTP (120 seconds in argon) and surface defects for constant surface copper of about 30×1012 atoms/cm2. The data also revealed the introduction of cross contamination of tungsten to the frontside surface of silicon wafers when air was used as the ambient with an activation energy of 0.8 eV for RTP of 120 seconds in air with temperatures ranging from 500°C to 1000°C. This cross contamination is presumed to come from prior tungsten silicide RTP, even though the quartz tube was etched before this study. Furthermore, the cross contamination of Ga and As occurred to the wafer backsides with no apparent activation energy, and this contamination is presumed to come from prior GaAs annealing several months before.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Sparks, Douglas R. and Chapman, Randall G., J. ECS 133, 1201 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Sparks, D. R., Chapman, R. C., and Alvi, N. S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 525 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Sparks, Douglas R., J. ECS 134, 458 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Barbier, D., Remram, M., Joly, J. F., and Laugier, A., J. Appl. Phys. 61, 156 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Adekoya, Wale-Oluseyi, Muller, Jean-Claude, and Siffert, Paul, Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 1240 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Quat, Vu Thuong, Eichhammer, W., and Siffert, P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 1928 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Quat, Vu Thuong, Eichhammer, W., and Siffert, P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 1235 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Takizawa, Ritsuo, Nakanishi, Toshiro, and Ohsawa, Akira, J. Appl. Phys. 62, 4933 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Shimazaki, A., Hiratsuka, H., Matsushita, Y., and Yoshi, S., Extended Abstracts of the 16th (1984 International) Conference on Solid State Devices and Materials, Kobe, p. 281 (1984).Google Scholar
10. Keenan, Joseph A., Gnade, Bruce E. and White, John B., J. ECS 132, 2232 (1985).Google Scholar
11. Hockett, R. S. and Katz, William, accepted for publication in the J. ECS.Google Scholar
12. Sadamitsu, Shinsuke, Sumita, Shigeo, Fujino, Nobukatsu, and Shiraiwa, Toshio, Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 27, L1819 (1988).Google Scholar
13. Eichinger, P., Rath, H. J., and Schwenke, H., Semiconductor Fabrication: Technology and Metrology, ASTM STP 990, Gupta, Dinesh C., editor, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1988.Google Scholar
14. Hockett, R. S., Baumann, S. M., and Schemmel, E., Diagnostic Techniques for Semiconductor Materials and Devices, edited by Shaffner, Thomas J. and Schroder, Dieter K., ECS Proceedings Vol. 88–20, 113 (1988).Google Scholar