Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:29:00.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chemical Reaction Between Polymers (Pc, Pmma, and Pet) and Oxygen Gas During Ar+ Irradiation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Sung-Chul Park ,
Hyung-Jin Jung  and
Seok-Keun Koh
Sung-Chul Park
Affiliation:
Ceramics Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 131 Cheon-ryang, Seoul, Korea
Hyung-Jin Jung
Affiliation:
Ceramics Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 131 Cheon-ryang, Seoul, Korea
Seok-Keun Koh
Affiliation:
Ceramics Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 131 Cheon-ryang, Seoul, Korea
Get access

Abstract

A surface of PC, PMMA, and PET samples irradiated with Ar+ ion of 1 keV energy with and without oxygen environment was investigated by contact angle measurement and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra. Contact angle of water droplets on the irradiated surface of the polymers decreased and remained almost constant with increasing Ar+ irradiation without oxygen. However, when the polymers were irradiated under oxygen environment, the contact angle markedly decreased with increasing ion dose upto 1016 ions/cm2. XPS results show that, after Ar+ irradiation under oxygen, hydrophilic groups were developed on PC, PMMA, and PET. The peak ratio (O/C) of PET irradiated without oxygen decreased with increasing ion dose, whereas that of PET irradiated under oxygen increased with ion dose upto 1016 ions/cm2

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 396: Symposium A – Ion-Solid Interactions for Materials Modification and Processing , 1995 , 347
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Schonhorn, H. and Hanson, R.H., J. Appi. Poly. Sci., 11, 1461 (1967)Google Scholar
2 Briggs, D., Ranee, D. G. and Kendall, C. R., Polymer, 21, 895 (1980)Google Scholar
3 LE Moel, A., Duravd, J. P. and Lecomte, C., Nucl. Instr. ' Methods in Physcics Reseach B 32, 115(1988)Google Scholar
4 Puglisi, O., Licciardello, A., Calcagno, L. and Foti, G., Nucl. Instr. ' Methods, B 19/20, 865 (1987)Google Scholar
5 Koh, S. K., Pae, K. D. and Caracciolo, R., Poly. Eng. Sci., 32, 558 (1992)Google Scholar
6 Basheer, R. A., Hamdi, A. H. and Kwon, R. Y., Nucl. Instr. ' Methods, B 32, 170 (1988)Google Scholar
7 Rao, G. R., Lee, E. H., Yao, X. and Brown, I. G., J. Mat. Sci., 30, 708 (1995)Google Scholar
8 Koh, S.K., Song, S.K., Choi, W.K. and Jung, H.J., J. Mater. Res., 10(9), 2390, (1995)Google Scholar
9 Cho, J. S., Choi, W. K., Yoon, K. H., Jung, H. J. and Koh, S. K., J. Mat. Res. (accepted)Google Scholar
10 Schonhorn, H., Hansen, R. H., J. Apply. Poly. Sci., 11, 1461 (1967)Google Scholar
11 Wu., S., Polymer Interface and adhesion; Marcel Dekken; New York, (1982)Google Scholar
12 Kaelble, D. H., Physical Chemistry of Adhesion: Wiley; New York (1971)Google Scholar
13 Cuomo, J., Rossnagel, S. M. and Kaufman, H. R., Handbook of ion beam process Technology, Noyes Publication, New Jersey, USA, p. 317 (1989)Google Scholar
14 Svorcik, V., Rybka, V., Micek, I., J. Mater. Res., 10(2), 468 (1995)Google Scholar
15 Karpuzov, D., Kostov, K. L., Nucl. Instr. ' Meth. in Phys. Res., B 39, 787 (1989)Google Scholar