Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T21:51:38.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Chemical Bonding Model for Photo-Induced Defects in Hydrogenated Amorphous Silicon (a-Si:H): Intrinsic and Extrinsic Reaction Pathways

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

G. Lucovsky
Affiliation:
Departments of Physics, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering, and Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
H. Yang
Affiliation:
Departments of Physics, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering, and Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
Get access

Abstract

In device grade a-Si:H photo- or light-induced defect generation is an intrinsic effect for impurity concentrations of oxygen and nitrogen below about 1019 to 1020 cm−3; however, at higher concentrations it increases with increasing impurity content. Charged defect configurations are identified by empirical chemistry and are studied by ab initio calculations. This paper addresses: i) the chemical stability of charged defects, ii) the reaction pathways for defect metastability, and iii) the transition between extrinsic and intrinsic behavior.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1) Lucovsky, G., Jing, Z. and Whitten, J.L., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 198–200, 340 (1996);Google Scholar
Lucovsky, G., Physics Status Solidi 159, 5 (1997) (erratum p. 12 4×1022 instead of 4×1023 cm−3).Google Scholar
2) Jing, Z. and Whitten, J.L., J. Chem. Phys. 98, 7466 (1993);Google Scholar
Jing, Z., Whitten, J.L. and Lucovsky, G., Phys. Rev. B 45, 13978 (1992).Google Scholar
3) Jing, Z. and Lucovsky, G., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13, 1613 (1995).Google Scholar
4) Kastner, M., Adler, D. and Fritzsche, H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 1504 (1976).Google Scholar
5) Chattopadhyay, A. et al., J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 163, 63 (1988).Google Scholar
6) Whitten, J.L. and Yang, H., Surf. Sci. Rep. 24, 55 (1996).Google Scholar
7) Buenker, R.J. and Peyerimhoff, S.D.. Theoret. Chim. Acta 35, 33 (1974).Google Scholar
8) Langhoff, S.R. and Davidson, E.R., J. Chem. Phys. 64, 4699 (1976).Google Scholar
9) Williams, M.J., He, S.S., Cho, S.M. and Lucovsky, G., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 12, 1072 (1994).Google Scholar
10) Tanaka, K., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 137&138, 1 (1991).Google Scholar
11) Parsons, G.N., Wang, C., Williams, M.J. and Lucovsky, G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 1895 (1990).Google Scholar
12) Yiping, Z. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 558, (1995).Google Scholar
13) Lucovsky, G. et al., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 198–200, 19 (1996).Google Scholar
14) Lucovsky, G. and Lin, S.Y., AIP Conf. Proc. 120, 55 (1984).Google Scholar
15) Davis, E.A., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 198–200, 1 (1996), and refs. therein.Google Scholar
16) Sugiyama, S., Yang, J. and Guha, S., MRS Symp. Proc. (1997), these proceedings.Google Scholar