Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T20:23:38.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Charge-trapping Metastability in p-Type Hydrogenated Amorphous Silicon: Meyer-Neldel Rule and Entropy Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Richard S. Crandall*
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401
Get access

Abstract

Measurements of capacitance transients due to charge carrier emission from metastable defects in p-type hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) p/n junction structures, show that both holes and electrons can be metastably trapped in the p layer. At 350 K electrons and holes are emitted at the same rate defining the isokinetic temperature (Tiso) for the Meyer-Neldel rule. The enthalpy changes for hole and electron emission are 0.94 and 0.51 eV, respectively. The entropy changes for hole and electron emission are 31 and 16 Boltzmann constant, respectively. Charge emission rates are measured, for the first time, above and below Tiso. Below Tiso electrons are emitted faster than holes and above Tiso the reverse is true. These relative changes in emission rates are a direct consequence of the large entropy changes in the defect reactions. Tiso, within experimental error is the same as the H glass equilibration temperature (360 K) measured by others in p-type a-Si:H, suggesting that the defect reactions measured here are involved in H glass equilibration. Activation and deactivation of B atoms with accompanying charge emission likely govern both processes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Crandall, R. S., J Non-Cryst Solids 266-269, 423 (2000).10.1016/S0022-3093(00)00046-6Google Scholar
2. Meyer, W. and Neldel, H., Z. Tech. Phys. 12, 588 (1937).Google Scholar
3. Street, R. A., Kakalios, J., Tsai, C. C. and Hayes, T. M., Phys. Rev. B 35, 1316 (1987).10.1103/PhysRevB.35.1316Google Scholar
4. Miller, G. L., Lang, D. V. and Kimerling, L. C., Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 7, 377 (1977).10.1146/annurev.ms.07.080177.002113Google Scholar
5. Phillips, J. C., Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 172-174, 98 (1994).10.1016/0022-3093(94)90421-9Google Scholar
6. Glasstone, S., Laidler, K. J. and Eyring, H., The Theory of Rate Processes (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1941).Google Scholar
7. Liu, E. Z. and Spear, W. E., J Non-Cryst Solids 137, 167 (1991).10.1016/S0022-3093(05)80082-1Google Scholar
8. Street, R. A., Hack, M. and Jackson, W. B., Phys. Rev. B 37, 4209 (1988).10.1103/PhysRevB.37.4209Google Scholar
9. McMahon, T. J. and Tsu, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 412 (1987).10.1063/1.98406Google Scholar
10. Crandall, R. S., Phys. Rev. B. 43, 4057 (1991).10.1103/PhysRevB.43.4057Google Scholar